- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@lancstelegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
@blackburnrovers
All the latest news from Blackburn Rovers
@burnleyfc
All the latest news from the Clarets
@lt_blackburn
Latest news from Blackburn
@lt_burnley
Latest news from Burnley
@lt_darwen
Latest news from Darwen
@lt_hyndburn
Latest news from Hyndburn
@lt_pendle
Latest news from Pendle
@lt_ribblevalley
Latest news from Ribble Valley
@lt_rossendale
Latest news from Rossendale
- Find us on Facebook
The Lancashire Telegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
Fury over approval of 55 homes near Whalley (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Fury over approval of 55 homes near Whalley
6:30pm Monday 15th October 2012 in News
By Jessica Cree, Education reporter
A PLANNING application for a controversial housing development near Whalley has been given the go-ahead.
The plans, for 55 homes and a 50-bed nursing home on land at Lawsonsteads Farm, to the east of Clitheroe Road, had been thrown out by councillors in July.
But a re-submitted application, which was put together by Indigo Planning on behalf of developers the Commercial Estates Group in a bid to meet the demand for housing in the borough, was approved at a meeting of Ribble Valley Council’s planning and development committee.
The company first submitted an application for 300 homes, the nursing home and a school for the site in February 2011, but those plans were rejected.
Ribble Valley Council’s proposed core strategy indicates that the borough needs to build around 200 houses every year up until 2020 in order to keep up with increased pressure.
But Nick Walker, from the Save Whalley Village Action Group, said the group’s members believed their concerns had been ignored.
He said: “The decision of Ribble Valley’s planning committee to approve an application to build on the Lawsonstead site in Whalley village is to be deplored.
“The loss of this site will damage the unique village landscape for ever.
“The development of this site will increase growing traffic problems, increase the risk of flooding from surface water drainage and increase the pressure on school places.
“We fear that the process of urban sprawl, already under way, will be accelerated by this decision.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (28)
6:44pm Mon 15 Oct 12
pip2pop says...
6:59pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
7:03pm Mon 15 Oct 12
2 for 5p says...
The door is now open council estate next for the NIMBYs.
7:04pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
7:17pm Mon 15 Oct 12
chammy30 says...
7:20pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
7:36pm Mon 15 Oct 12
chammy30 says...
7:49pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
10:27pm Mon 15 Oct 12
2 for 5p says...
10:41pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
10:50pm Mon 15 Oct 12
pip2pop says...
-Bernard Manning
10:58pm Mon 15 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
9:48am Tue 16 Oct 12
eastlancslad says...
You are therefore, in fact, irrelevant.
10:27am Tue 16 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
4:30pm Tue 16 Oct 12
eastlancslad says...
Nice try though.
5:57pm Tue 16 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
10:17pm Tue 16 Oct 12
Bramley Meade Boy says...
10:24pm Tue 16 Oct 12
Bramley Meade Boy says...
10:37pm Tue 16 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
11:01pm Tue 16 Oct 12
Rimbus says...
11:20pm Tue 16 Oct 12
Bramley Meade Boy says...
11:35pm Tue 16 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
11:53pm Tue 16 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
12:18am Wed 17 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
!!!!!
7:30am Wed 17 Oct 12
Bramley Meade Boy says...
8:33pm Tue 23 Oct 12
Michael@ClitheroeSince58 says...
9:10pm Tue 23 Oct 12
accy lad and proud says...
7:08pm Mon 5 Nov 12
ghost of sceptic says...