Blackburn with Darwen Council in new landlord licensing row (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Blackburn with Darwen Council in new landlord licensing row
8:00am Friday 5th October 2012 in News
BLACKBURN with Darwen council was in the midst of a new landlord licensing row as property experts claimed the scheme put people off buying to rent which had contributed to the borough’s house price slump.
The authority currently licenses landlords in the Infirmary and Mill Hill districts of Blackburn and parts of Darwen.
But local conveyancing solicitor Charlotte Ferguson and property management expert Paul Ainsworth-Lord said the scheme - also operated in Trinity in Burnley and parts of Hyndburn - is driving away purchasers who want to let property as mortgage lenders will not advance cash for buy to let clients there.
But Blackburn with Darwen borough defended the scheme saying it drove up tenanted property standards and disputed the claims.
The row erupted as homeless charity Shelter produced figures showing East Lancashire boroughs received more than 4,500 complaints about private landlords in the last four years prosecuting 16 of them.
Blackburn solicitor Ms Ferguson said: “As a conveyancing solicitor, I know most mainstream buy-to-let lenders will not lend on properties that are subject to selective licensing. This could mean that properties remain unsold and the regeneration of the area is undermined.”
Mr Ainsworth-Lord referred to figures this week showing house prices in Blackburn had plummeted by 26.2 per cent in a year.
He said: “Selective licensing drives out landlords. Most major financial institutions will not lend for buy to let in such areas. That explains some of the house price slump.”
Shelter policy director Kay Boycott said: “ Selective licensing can give more ammunition ensure landlords fulfill their basic responsibilities, protecting vulnerable tenants from this minority making their lives hell.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (15)
8:24am Fri 5 Oct 12
Excluded again says...
Yet again an example of our greedy, sociopathic banks. Profit at all costs. Who cares if people are terrorised by nuisance neighbours, if the bonuses which pay for my champagne Ferrarri and yacht are put at risk?
Yet another reason to take your money out of the banks and put it somewhere more responsible.
10:03am Fri 5 Oct 12
midas says...
10:20am Fri 5 Oct 12
jimpy0 says...
10:53am Fri 5 Oct 12
midas says...
.
I have 28 houses that are all occupied, I haven't had a tenant leave for over 3 years. I do the repairs and they pay the rent, everyones happy.
.
I wouldn't buy a house in a licensed area, why would I?
12:39pm Fri 5 Oct 12
jimpy0 says...
and thats the attitude
1:11pm Fri 5 Oct 12
jack daniels says...
There where still 4,500 complaints about private landlords in the last four years, so it seems that the licensing scheme can be justified because of a few bad apple spoiling it for the rest
2:05pm Fri 5 Oct 12
tonygreaves says...
Tony Greaves
2:05pm Fri 5 Oct 12
makaveli96 says...
2:48pm Fri 5 Oct 12
midas says...
2:59pm Fri 5 Oct 12
midas says...
.
How many prosecutions have Pendle brought against landlords who don't keep their properties maintained? How many tenants evicted for anti-socil behaviour? How many ASBOs or house closure orders have the Council got against unruly tenants?
.
Perhaps you should spend more time getting your own house in order rather than criticising someone doing what you should be doing, providing good quality housing!
.
My tenants are happy with me because I respond to them and sort things out and in return they pay their rent on time, its win win all round. Not looking after your tenants is just bad business. They stop paying their rent, they stop looking after the property and eventually they leave and not only have you lost 3 or 4 months worth of rent you then need to refurbish the house which has been left in a terrible state!
4:51pm Fri 5 Oct 12
Good call says...
http://www.infowars.
com/national-virtual
-id-card-scheme-set-
for-launch-is-there-
anything-that-could-
possibly-go-wrong/
8:19pm Fri 5 Oct 12
workaholic says...
Logically - tenants have a choice whether they wish to live in a property or not - therefore the problem will sort itself out once bad landlords realise they are unable to let their properties because of the condition they are in !
7:50am Sat 6 Oct 12
jack daniels says...
The biggest flaws in your argument are that you have signed a contract which you can't easily get out of, and to move out of a bad place you need a deposit for your new house. Obviously, because your spare money is already with the feckless landlord anyway (who may find an excuse not to pay it back), it's difficult to do the obvious.
7:59am Sat 6 Oct 12
jack daniels says...
Interesting that the council like their idea, the charity SHELTER like the idea, but the property management and solicitors don't.
Hmm, go figure....
10:53pm Sun 7 Oct 12
retired one says...