Drop in injuries after 20mph limit pilot scheme in Burnley

LANCASHIRE County Council is stepping up a £9million scheme to impose 20mph speed limits in all residential areas, after a Burnley pilot project showed a major fall in accidents, injuries, and deaths.

The test covered Rosegrove and Gannow, and was one of three across the county area.

In the South West Burnley pilot, over the 15 months from February 2011 to April 2012, the num-ber of total casualties was seven, all slight, with no serious injuries, or deaths.

That compared with 33 casualties in the three years from November 2007 to October 2010, 11 every 12 months, with five deaths, or serious injuries, 1.66 a year, and 28 slight injuries, 9.33 a year.

The figures for 0 to 15-year-olds in the Burnley pilot areas were five slight injuries, and no deaths, or serious injuries, in the 15 months of the scheme.

For the three-year comp-arison period, the figures were 12 casualties (four a year), one death, or serious injury (0.33 a year) and 11 slight injuries (2.66 a year).

Over all three pilot areas, the overall figures fell from 46 cas-ualties a year, with six deaths and serious injuries, to 25, with two deaths and serious injuries, and no child deaths and serious injuries.

County council leader Geoff Driver intends that by 2014 there will be a 20mph speed limit on all residential streets in Burn-ley, Pendle, Ribble Valley, Hynd- burn and Rossendale, controlled with signs only, rather than further traffic calming measures such as speed humps. Part-time speed restrictions will be brought in for schools on busy roads.

He said: “We have completed half of our programme of bringing in the 20mph limit to 248 residential estates in the Lancashire county area.

“The evidence from the Burnley, and other pilot schemes is that it is cutting serious accidents involving pedestrians, cyclists, and particularly children.”

Lancashire’s assistant chief constable for traffic Andy Rhodes said: “We work with local mot-orists first by persuasion and education, and then by enforc-ement and prosecution.

“We ask residents to help identify persistent offenders and compile a list of the top ten anti-social drivers for each area, who are then subject to police observation and visits.”

Comments(9)

darwenTower says...
4:26pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Brilliant.

Now people can walk safely in the roads.

Reduce the speed limit to 10mph and maybe we can reduce the seven remaining casualties to zero.

JayEss says...
9:07pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Great idea.

Residential areas should be for pedestrians with slow access permitted for road traffic. Maybe this will allow more kids to play too, reduce the childhood obesity problem a bit.

Marsdogs says...
9:17pm Fri 28 Sep 12

What a load of old rubbish. These speed limits are not enforced and are a waste of time. 30mph plus better driving is sufficient. Squandering money on new speed signs for every residential street is outrageous.

psch says...
10:48am Sat 29 Sep 12

Just manipulation of unsatisfactory statistics to justify an expensive policy which is not working. Anybody who is trained in statistics like myself knows that this data is totally ludicrous and should not form the basis of any decision and indeed anyone who uses it should not be in their job. I believe a much larger UK sample which reported a few weeks ago showed the opposite result.
I live in the area and the project is not wanted, not needed and the limits are by and large ignored. It is about time Driver just p****ed off.

Rimbus says...
1:00am Sun 30 Sep 12

psch wrote:
Just manipulation of unsatisfactory statistics to justify an expensive policy which is not working. Anybody who is trained in statistics like myself knows that this data is totally ludicrous and should not form the basis of any decision and indeed anyone who uses it should not be in their job. I believe a much larger UK sample which reported a few weeks ago showed the opposite result.
I live in the area and the project is not wanted, not needed and the limits are by and large ignored. It is about time Driver just p****ed off.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics".

Benjamin Disraeli
(1804 - 1881)

DaveBurnley says...
10:02am Sun 30 Sep 12

I presume that BMWs and taxis will be exempt from these speed limits?

rilistic says...
10:01pm Sun 30 Sep 12

Disgraceful psch - you obviously don't care how many children are killed or seriously injured. You sound like the sort of person who wouldn't stop if you hit a child in your car because you would convince yourself that statistically it must have been the child's fault.

DaveBurnley says...
8:44am Mon 1 Oct 12

rilistic wrote:
Disgraceful psch - you obviously don't care how many children are killed or seriously injured. You sound like the sort of person who wouldn't stop if you hit a child in your car because you would convince yourself that statistically it must have been the child's fault.
Where does psch imply that he "obviously don't care how many children are killed or seriously injured"? He's simply made the point that a larger survey recently 'proved' the opposite, ie that lower speed limits didn't work.

rilistic says...
10:25pm Mon 1 Oct 12

Do you really believe that Dave?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree