Dramatic rise in homelessness in East Lancashire (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Be carefull with this one people. Centrepoint is now sectioning the homeless who refuse their services.
Centrepoint has prince william as its patron with a more sinister mind and Blair babe in control :

https://www.lifeinth
emix.info/2011/12/pr
ofile-lord-adebowale
-ma-cbe/

I am affraid that next month times are going to get much harder because if you are under 25 years old and renting from a private landlord or letting agent, you are probably only entitled to enough benefit to cover the cost of renting a single room in a shared house, even if you are renting self-contained accommodation.
If you are over 25, the maximum amount of housing benefit you can receive may also be restricted if you are living in shared accommodation.
From January 2012, these rules will apply to people aged up to 35 years. This will mean that, unless you are already in shared accommodation, you will see a cut to your LHA payment if you are aged under-35. You may no longer be able to afford your current property as a result. You may have to find shared accommodation, or a cheaper alternative.Yet the government have only just given the banksters 75 billion of our hard earned tax money
as their personal bonuses.When will the populous open their blinkered eyes and see whats happening around them.When the nukes are falling out the sky i expect.

QuarryGang78 wrote:
I am affraid that next month times are going to get much harder because if you are under 25 years old and renting from a private landlord or letting agent, you are probably only entitled to enough benefit to cover the cost of renting a single room in a shared house, even if you are renting self-contained accommodation.
If you are over 25, the maximum amount of housing benefit you can receive may also be restricted if you are living in shared accommodation.
From January 2012, these rules will apply to people aged up to 35 years. This will mean that, unless you are already in shared accommodation, you will see a cut to your LHA payment if you are aged under-35. You may no longer be able to afford your current property as a result. You may have to find shared accommodation, or a cheaper alternative.Yet the government have only just given the banksters 75 billion of our hard earned tax money
as their personal bonuses.When will the populous open their blinkered eyes and see whats happening around them.When the nukes are falling out the sky i expect.

Thanks for that, Quarry Gang.

Politics is and always has been just a game played by those who have made it their profession to do so. Red, blue, grey makes no difference at all. Just a game played by those who are paid very well for doing so!

Politics has always been a class game so please ask yourself the following question: Who has the most money, Conservative Cameron or new labour, three houses Blair?

Blair’s son Ed Miliband quote: What’s gone wrong?

But Ed should know the answer to that one because he and his brother and all of the other Blair hangers on helped to make it all go wrong when they were in power.

What a silly game they all play at our expense!

Lifeinthemix wrote:
Be carefull with this one people. Centrepoint is now sectioning the homeless who refuse their services.
Centrepoint has prince william as its patron with a more sinister mind and Blair babe in control :

https://www.lifeinth

emix.info/2011/12/pr

ofile-lord-adebowale

-ma-cbe/

So you are saying in your article that black africans are following homeless people around in birminham raping them and these said same black africans are in with a better chance of being fast tracked to overlord status because they are black? Also in the article you state that people who are sectioned by centre point are never heard from again and centre point is run by one of these fast tracked " imports " as you call them. Are you implying that they are cannibals as well??
Better get yourself a good lawyer if you think that Prince William is somehow party to your strange rantings. Are you a racist? Are you blaming them coz as black?
Smoking kills 100,000 people in this country every year which pales into insignificance the number of homeless ready meals that go missing, yet you support that one and there are no blacks involved. You are so thoughtful of your fellow man. Maybe the missing homeless have gone to work in your tobacco harvesting slave labour camps. This is where you find the facists and overlords, peddling legal drugs to the hypocrites.

Anyway back on track, is it me or, how can there be an article on increasing homelessness on one page of the LT and some councillor in brierfield complaining about boarded up empty houses on another? Hello is there anybody in??? Obviously not.

Keep Darwen Green wrote:
Anyway back on track, is it me or, how can there be an article on increasing homelessness on one page of the LT and some councillor in brierfield complaining about boarded up empty houses on another? Hello is there anybody in??? Obviously not.

simple answer...they are there but not awake and will rant all day about rubbish.

green fingers...it is not I saying prince william is the patron of centrepoint, he is.

i am not saying anything relating to blacks and rape, this was reported to me by a homless contact in birmingham and derby. the contact had no idea of the leaping lords involvment with centrepoint.

It was suggested to me that those sectioned if fit, are being taken to a boot camp in Wales, but there is no evidence to support this so the use of the term not seen again, stands.

You are more than welcome to speak with my varied multiculteral network and ask them if I be a rascist.

I see you have chosen the way of the bacon, la la insult with a little more la la

why not consider patrolling your street in the new year, it might just get you that bump on the head required in order you can learn comprehension of words and sentences

Lifeinthemix wrote:
green fingers...it is not I saying prince william is the patron of centrepoint, he is.

i am not saying anything relating to blacks and rape, this was reported to me by a homless contact in birmingham and derby. the contact had no idea of the leaping lords involvment with centrepoint.

It was suggested to me that those sectioned if fit, are being taken to a boot camp in Wales, but there is no evidence to support this so the use of the term not seen again, stands.

You are more than welcome to speak with my varied multiculteral network and ask them if I be a rascist.

I see you have chosen the way of the bacon, la la insult with a little more la la

why not consider patrolling your street in the new year, it might just get you that bump on the head required in order you can learn comprehension of words and sentences

No thanks I'll stick to maths a bit of programming and music of which you will be pants at all three. But hey, I don't point it out to you do I?
And by the way, I do actually know someone who has been sectioned on a number of occasions, he now lives in his own little flat with a flat topped roof. He still thinks someone is living in his ceiling though, I put this down to the methadone, so I would take what someone tells you, who has been sectioned, with a pinch of salt. Otherwise you may become guest in the next bed. You see most that are sectioned are done so under the mental health act, after refusing help, so are usually suffering some form of mental illness. Mental illness usually brought on by some form of substance dependancy or withdrawls from the same. But that wouldn't fit in with your sensationalistic view on everything would it? Did it never occur to you that your contact may be dilusional? or on medication. No didn't think so, and they can be very convincing too, because they actually believe what they are telling you.
You on the other hand have no excuses, you need to dig deeper and stop being lazy. A scoop, as you call it, needs to be confirmed by more than two independent sources before you should commit it to an article. And preferably not three recovering smack heads.
Must do better. D

It's simple demographics, we have a housing shortage, our NHS is failing, our schools can't offer enough places to children, our benefits syst is on the point of collapse, our finances are collapsing and yet we still insist on allowing thousands more people into our country ever month. Supposed asylum seekers who, were they genuine, would seek refuge in the first safe country they came to. Instead of trecking half way around the world for the free cash and housing handouts of the UK, the land of milk and honey. Couple that with the work shy generations that are coming through, who churn out child after child for financial gain, what do people expect? We need tougher measures to stop benefit cheats, tougher measures to stop theives bleeding the NHS dry, claiming ridiculous items on free prescription when they are working and can afford 25p for paracetemol. We need to limit child benefit to two children per family and tell these idiots with 5 and 6 kids if you can't afford to keep the kids yourself you shouldn't have more than two. We are a nation in crisis because we are too soft.

Keep Darwen Green wrote:

Lifeinthemix wrote:
green fingers...it is not I saying prince william is the patron of centrepoint, he is.

i am not saying anything relating to blacks and rape, this was reported to me by a homless contact in birmingham and derby. the contact had no idea of the leaping lords involvment with centrepoint.

It was suggested to me that those sectioned if fit, are being taken to a boot camp in Wales, but there is no evidence to support this so the use of the term not seen again, stands.

You are more than welcome to speak with my varied multiculteral network and ask them if I be a rascist.

I see you have chosen the way of the bacon, la la insult with a little more la la

why not consider patrolling your street in the new year, it might just get you that bump on the head required in order you can learn comprehension of words and sentences

No thanks I'll stick to maths a bit of programming and music of which you will be pants at all three. But hey, I don't point it out to you do I?
And by the way, I do actually know someone who has been sectioned on a number of occasions, he now lives in his own little flat with a flat topped roof. He still thinks someone is living in his ceiling though, I put this down to the methadone, so I would take what someone tells you, who has been sectioned, with a pinch of salt. Otherwise you may become guest in the next bed. You see most that are sectioned are done so under the mental health act, after refusing help, so are usually suffering some form of mental illness. Mental illness usually brought on by some form of substance dependancy or withdrawls from the same. But that wouldn't fit in with your sensationalistic view on everything would it? Did it never occur to you that your contact may be dilusional? or on medication. No didn't think so, and they can be very convincing too, because they actually believe what they are telling you.
You on the other hand have no excuses, you need to dig deeper and stop being lazy. A scoop, as you call it, needs to be confirmed by more than two independent sources before you should commit it to an article. And preferably not three recovering smack heads.
Must do better. D

goodness me greenie, do you think I would deal with nutters?

not all on the streets need to be there, some choose to learn and see.

I take your point about substance abuse but if you believe all on the streets are there from substance abuse, then you are mistaken. many end up there through debt and statute collection of it leaving them with nothing, many are there because of a breakdown of their marriage, there are lots of people fall below the social net and for as many reasons.

In 2009 under the pandamic scare, the mental health act was tweaked a lot, it is under this WHO sanctioned dictate that sectioning of people without basis in fact can go ahead.

As it was, to be sectioned whatever the reason, prevented powerful people removing enemies, today when the corporate state is the enemy, on top of the tweaks, then we are indeed witnessing a serious shift from freedom to absolute suppression of ideas and actions deemed an enemy to the incorporation of every living thing.

If you are ok with this then that is your right, i am not happy with the situation and do as I do.

Leaving such a future to our children is perhaps the greatest form of abuse an adult can create for all children, and given the corporate state is the perpetraitor of this insanity then it is they who are the abusers, yet you and others not only adore this reality, you police it for them by shouting down those who expose the situation.

thats life when adults refuse to be adults and protect the children, which leaves only the corporate state to do it for you. Its like watching adults desperate to be children again without any thoughts for the welfare of the children and the nation they live within.

Lifeinthemix wrote:

Keep Darwen Green wrote:

Lifeinthemix wrote:
green fingers...it is not I saying prince william is the patron of centrepoint, he is.

i am not saying anything relating to blacks and rape, this was reported to me by a homless contact in birmingham and derby. the contact had no idea of the leaping lords involvment with centrepoint.

It was suggested to me that those sectioned if fit, are being taken to a boot camp in Wales, but there is no evidence to support this so the use of the term not seen again, stands.

You are more than welcome to speak with my varied multiculteral network and ask them if I be a rascist.

I see you have chosen the way of the bacon, la la insult with a little more la la

why not consider patrolling your street in the new year, it might just get you that bump on the head required in order you can learn comprehension of words and sentences

No thanks I'll stick to maths a bit of programming and music of which you will be pants at all three. But hey, I don't point it out to you do I?
And by the way, I do actually know someone who has been sectioned on a number of occasions, he now lives in his own little flat with a flat topped roof. He still thinks someone is living in his ceiling though, I put this down to the methadone, so I would take what someone tells you, who has been sectioned, with a pinch of salt. Otherwise you may become guest in the next bed. You see most that are sectioned are done so under the mental health act, after refusing help, so are usually suffering some form of mental illness. Mental illness usually brought on by some form of substance dependancy or withdrawls from the same. But that wouldn't fit in with your sensationalistic view on everything would it? Did it never occur to you that your contact may be dilusional? or on medication. No didn't think so, and they can be very convincing too, because they actually believe what they are telling you.
You on the other hand have no excuses, you need to dig deeper and stop being lazy. A scoop, as you call it, needs to be confirmed by more than two independent sources before you should commit it to an article. And preferably not three recovering smack heads.
Must do better. D

goodness me greenie, do you think I would deal with nutters?

not all on the streets need to be there, some choose to learn and see.

I take your point about substance abuse but if you believe all on the streets are there from substance abuse, then you are mistaken. many end up there through debt and statute collection of it leaving them with nothing, many are there because of a breakdown of their marriage, there are lots of people fall below the social net and for as many reasons.

In 2009 under the pandamic scare, the mental health act was tweaked a lot, it is under this WHO sanctioned dictate that sectioning of people without basis in fact can go ahead.

As it was, to be sectioned whatever the reason, prevented powerful people removing enemies, today when the corporate state is the enemy, on top of the tweaks, then we are indeed witnessing a serious shift from freedom to absolute suppression of ideas and actions deemed an enemy to the incorporation of every living thing.

If you are ok with this then that is your right, i am not happy with the situation and do as I do.

Leaving such a future to our children is perhaps the greatest form of abuse an adult can create for all children, and given the corporate state is the perpetraitor of this insanity then it is they who are the abusers, yet you and others not only adore this reality, you police it for them by shouting down those who expose the situation.

thats life when adults refuse to be adults and protect the children, which leaves only the corporate state to do it for you. Its like watching adults desperate to be children again without any thoughts for the welfare of the children and the nation they live within.

Have you got your tin-foil hat on, nonlifeinthemix? You wrote the above at 12.08 in the AM indicating you really need, and I mean need in a bad way, to get a life. All your inane, immature, 'big-boy-hit-me-and-
ran-away' rants are beneath contempt.

When even a stopped clock is correct twice a day, how come you have failed to be right even once?

What I'm getting here is your craving for a dependency that isn't forthcoming in the way you need it. You believe you'd organise benefits of a dependency nature better than those 'uncaring buffoons' in charge, don't you?

Starting from that point, we can begin to unravel your manifold problems.

Lifeinthemix wrote:

Keep Darwen Green wrote:
Anyway back on track, is it me or, how can there be an article on increasing homelessness on one page of the LT and some councillor in brierfield complaining about boarded up empty houses on another? Hello is there anybody in??? Obviously not.

simple answer...they are there but not awake and will rant all day about rubbish.

Very much like you then eh ?

If private landlords were paid directly like they used to be rather than the tenant receiving 'what is quite often a substantial first payment' then I am convinced this would help reduce the number of homeless people on the street. Some of these young people have never had any money in their possession then suddenly get a payment into their bank for several hundred pounds for up to six or eight weeks initial rent - and the temptation is just too great for them, so they end up spending this and then lose their home as a result! The other problem is that most Private landlords will not entertain anyone between the age of 16 to 25 as their rent allowance is capped to around £50 per week! Perhaps this should apply up until the age of 18 but why up to 25?