When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
3:43pm Sunday 10th April 2011 in News
TWO East Lancashire Conservative MPs ‘should be ashamed’ after voting for 20 per cent cuts to the county's police budget, according to rank and file officers.
The chairman of the Lancashire Police Authority John O’Reilly has accused Darwen and Rossendale’s Jake Berry and Pendle’s Andrew Stephenson of putting party politics before public safety.
And he urged people to bombard them and Lancashire’s four other Tory MPs with protests.
Lancashire Constabulary is axing 500 police officers and 300 staff as well as making cuts to a range of departments, including the frontline, as it has reduces its spending by £42million over the next four years.
Mr Stephenson said he had ‘great respect’ for the police, but insisted there was no other option due to the budget deficit left by Labour.
Mr O’Reilly said leaders of the Lancashire Police Federation, which represents rank and file, would be writing to the MPs to ‘express their disgust’ that they voted for the cuts.
He added: “I would be ashamed if I was one of those MPs.
“They haven’t looked at the devastation which will be caused by these cuts. They have just toed the party line and to disregarded public opinion and fears.
“This debate was an opportunity for MPs to have their say and vote against the cuts. But these six from Lancashire couldn’t do that, despite the strength of public feeling.
“So they have to ask themselves, did they truly represent the feelings of their constituents when they voted to cut policing by 20 per cent?”
Mr Stephenson said: “Labour created a huge deficit and would not be able to prevent frontline cuts.
“I have great respect for the police and the difficult role they carry out.”
Mr Berry could not be contacted for comment.
Comments(14)
Atticman
says...
4:17pm Sun 10 Apr 11
always worked
says...
5:16pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Cupofbeans
says...
5:19pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Atticman
says...
5:38pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Cupofbeans wrote:I have no problem with the police, I have close family and friends in the job. My comment was more about management. I never said get rid of all cars but reducing certain things may help. We could still have response teams but more police on the street in the communities would be a deterrent in alot of the petty crime that is costing the TAX payer more than the odd murder here and there. A police person tucked away in the dead of night can hear and observe much more than two sat in a car being seen from hundreds of yards away. There's also alot of places a car can't get that a person on foot can patrol.
Firstly Tyrone, no officers were paid overtime for the EDL march. All officers deployed onthe operation had their day off work cancelled, and were given the opportunity to take another shift off work instead.
Atticman, it seems odd that you think that by reducing the number of cars that crime will be reduced. For a start, community beat officers and PCSO's increase the visibility of the Police. But, if a emergency response officer is taken from their car their impact is dramatically reduced. What was a 2 minute drive to an ongoing assault would then become a 30 minute walk. Therefor what would have been a bruise or two, my increase to a wounding or even murder. Due to the increased response times from bobbies being on foot would lead to offenders fleeing the scene, suicidal persons carrying our their intentions, crime increase, detection decrease etc.
I appreciate that seeing an officer on foot is reassuring, but taking an officer from their car is massively adverse on how effectively they can respond.
You might have your own personal issues with the police, but it might be worth thinking before you type.
always worked
says...
5:39pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Excluded again
says...
9:01pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Wigansalad
says...
9:31pm Sun 10 Apr 11
Whats the Matta
says...
12:50pm Mon 11 Apr 11
Excluded again wrote:
'Mr Berry could not be contacted for comment.'
Your reporter probably made the mistake of trying to find him Darwen or Rossendale. Try Cheshire.
'Mr Berry could not be contacted for comment.'
Your reporter probably made the mistake of trying to find him Darwen or Rossendale. Try Cheshire.
PolFed
says...
10:51am Tue 12 Apr 11
Atticman wrote:It’s interesting to note the suggestion that reducing the number of police cars will in some way save front line Police Officers because the author is absolutely correct. That is why Lancashire Constabulary with the full support of the Police Federation and the Unions carried out over 50 Organisational Reviews (OR’s) into all areas of business to make savings where they can be made. One of those OR’s was into ‘fleet’ and the outcome was that indeed they have chosen to reduce the number of police cars. However despite all the savings from the OR's, The public of Lancashire WILL loose around 800 Police Officers due to Government cuts to Policing.
Why don't they start by reducing the number of police cars that they are paying out for and put the bobbies back on the beat. This will bring their profile back up to what it used to be and help reduce crime which means they will not be paying rediculus amounts of overtime because they can't manage the work load with the number of bobbies available. If we tried to go back to how things used to run then maybe we could get more for our tax. I'm not know the bobbies they do what they can but it's how it's managed that needs looking at.
Atticman
says...
11:42am Tue 12 Apr 11
PolFed wrote:Thank you for supporting my theory.
Atticman wrote: Why don't they start by reducing the number of police cars that they are paying out for and put the bobbies back on the beat. This will bring their profile back up to what it used to be and help reduce crime which means they will not be paying rediculus amounts of overtime because they can't manage the work load with the number of bobbies available. If we tried to go back to how things used to run then maybe we could get more for our tax. I'm not know the bobbies they do what they can but it's how it's managed that needs looking at.It’s interesting to note the suggestion that reducing the number of police cars will in some way save front line Police Officers because the author is absolutely correct. That is why Lancashire Constabulary with the full support of the Police Federation and the Unions carried out over 50 Organisational Reviews (OR’s) into all areas of business to make savings where they can be made. One of those OR’s was into ‘fleet’ and the outcome was that indeed they have chosen to reduce the number of police cars. However despite all the savings from the OR's, The public of Lancashire WILL loose around 800 Police Officers due to Government cuts to Policing.
darwen sense
says...
12:58pm Tue 12 Apr 11
Graham Hartley
says...
5:42pm Tue 12 Apr 11
Graham Hartley
says...
6:00pm Tue 12 Apr 11
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
TyronethePikey says...
4:02pm Sun 10 Apr 11