When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
8:00am Monday 17th January 2011 in News
By Sam Chadderton, Reporter
ONLY one police officer out of 74 accused of sex crimes has been jailed in the past six years.
Many Lancashire officers and staff did, however, resign or were sacked without charges.
But others faced no further action, it can be revealed.
The Police Federation said officers were often the subject of ‘malicious allegations’, but a trustee at a leading rape and abuse centre said she was concerned police bosses were turning a ‘blind eye’ hoping the issue would ‘go away’.
Now an MP is urging the home secretary Theresa May to bring in stricter monitoring of police officers accused of any crime.
Over the past six years, PCs, sergeants and other constabulary employees have been accused of sexual offences including rape, sexual assault, possessing indecent images, sexual activity with a child and sending indecent images through the post.
Of the 74 accused, 28 faced no further action. A further third, 27 people, either resigned or were dismissed, with eight given warnings or disciplinary action and nine facing court.
The rest, including some of the more recent allegations, are still pending.
Incidents included:
Charities such as Rape Crisis have responded to the figures by saying the public expect sex cases involving police to be ‘prosecuted rigorously’ but instead ‘forces are quietly losing staff in the hope the issue will go away’.
Trustee Jo Wood, from the Merseyside Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre, said police bosses were ‘turning a blind eye’.
She said: “There is still a massive stigma to being convicted of this kind of serious offence, which is why it would appear that police are trying to get people out of the picture as quickly as possible so they don’t have convicted officers. “I would suggest that this situation is exactly the same as at other big organisations where people would be horrified to bring a conviction on to their profession.”
Rachel Baines, vice-chairman of the Lancashire Police Federation, said police officers could face the problem of ‘malicious allegations’.
She said: “I strongly believe that all cases are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated.
“In my experience the CPS make no allowances for the fact the accused is a police officer and substantiated cases are taken to CPS, which is quite right.
“Resigning does not mean an officer escapes prosecution, although you have to remember that the burden of proof in misconduct cases is much lower than the criminal standard, which is why you may see officers facing misconduct proceedings, but not criminal proceedings.
Supt Martyn Leveridge, head of Lancashire’s professional standards department, said: “We take complaints of this nature very seriously and have a duty to thoroughly investigate any allegations made to us.
"The public quite rightly demands very high standards of its police service, and we are aiming to consistently deliver a service that meets those expectations.”
Pendle MP Andrew Stephenson said he had raised the issue of police officers accused of any crime in Parliament following the conviction of Nelson officer Salim Razaq, who ran an organised crime gang.
He said: “I asked for statistics of how many officers are accused of crimes and how many are convicted and was told those statistics are not kept.
“I am shocked at these new figures as any officer accused of a crime should undergo the same legal process anyone else would.
"Any suggestion that it can be handled away from the courts is wrong.”
Comments(17)
Manuel Hung
says...
8:18am Mon 17 Jan 11
adamdesk
says...
9:11am Mon 17 Jan 11
burner
says...
9:14am Mon 17 Jan 11
coxy78
says...
11:08am Mon 17 Jan 11
chris283
says...
11:52am Mon 17 Jan 11
Gaz M
says...
11:57am Mon 17 Jan 11
Lifeinthemix
says...
12:28pm Mon 17 Jan 11
bankhall
says...
12:59pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Ian123xyz
says...
4:57pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Lifeinthemix
says...
6:40pm Mon 17 Jan 11
tim83
says...
7:13pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Lifeinthemix
says...
8:27pm Mon 17 Jan 11
darwen sense
says...
8:29pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Chris P Bacon
says...
8:36pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Lifeinthemix wrote:The Royal Ascent? Where are the Royals climbing?
Ian123xyz
.
The simple fact is the labour government did produce some 4600 new statutes during its years of treason, they are certainly not laws, which can only be brought fourth with full consent of the people and then royal ascent, not the corporate royal ascent, the office of monarch...
Lifeinthemix
says...
8:38pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Chris P Bacon
says...
9:54pm Mon 17 Jan 11
Lifeinthemix wrote:No comma where required, most of us will be unaware of the 77 bombings you refer to (IN 77 or in number?), no apostrophe required after the 0 in 1990s, it's per se not 'per say', that's meaningless.
darwen sense
.
The Brazilian underground electrician murdered in fact executed in front of a terrified London underground mass of people after the 77 bombings.
.
John Gardener during the 1990's...need I go on.
.
It is not so much the police per say, it is special units within the police made so on the back of the arming of our police, in the main populated by ex special forces and marksmen.
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
alan7554 says...
8:01am Mon 17 Jan 11