News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Lancashire police sex crimes shock

RESPONSE: Police say allegations are taken very seriously RESPONSE: Police say allegations are taken very seriously

ONLY one police officer out of 74 accused of sex crimes has been jailed in the past six years.

Many Lancashire officers and staff did, however, resign or were sacked without charges.

But others faced no further action, it can be revealed.

The Police Federation said officers were often the subject of ‘malicious allegations’, but a trustee at a leading rape and abuse centre said she was concerned police bosses were turning a ‘blind eye’ hoping the issue would ‘go away’.

Now an MP is urging the home secretary Theresa May to bring in stricter monitoring of police officers accused of any crime.

Over the past six years, PCs, sergeants and other constabulary employees have been accused of sexual offences including rape, sexual assault, possessing indecent images, sexual activity with a child and sending indecent images through the post.

Of the 74 accused, 28 faced no further action. A further third, 27 people, either resigned or were dismissed, with eight given warnings or disciplinary action and nine facing court.

The rest, including some of the more recent allegations, are still pending.

Incidents included:

  • An officer from Clitheroe being reported for having sexually assaulted a 20-year-old man and for having indecent images on his home computer. No further action was taken on the assault claim, but he resigned over the images allegation and was later given a suspended sentence.
  • A Darwen PC given a written warning after a complaint was made that he had been trying to engage a 40-year-old woman in a sexual relationship over a period of time and had abused his position.
  • A member of police staff accused of having sex with a 15-year-old girl in Burnley. He resigned less than a month later and was eventually given a caution for sexual activity with a child.
  • Four years ago, an officer was dismissed for sexually assaulting a 54-year-old woman at her home in Whittle-le-Woods after police had been called to deal with an incident. The officer never faced any charges.
  • In a case last month, Heysham community beat manager Lance Thompson, 46, was jailed for downloading child porn on his home computer.

Charities such as Rape Crisis have responded to the figures by saying the public expect sex cases involving police to be ‘prosecuted rigorously’ but instead ‘forces are quietly losing staff in the hope the issue will go away’.

Trustee Jo Wood, from the Merseyside Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre, said police bosses were ‘turning a blind eye’.

She said: “There is still a massive stigma to being convicted of this kind of serious offence, which is why it would appear that police are trying to get people out of the picture as quickly as possible so they don’t have convicted officers. “I would suggest that this situation is exactly the same as at other big organisations where people would be horrified to bring a conviction on to their profession.”

Rachel Baines, vice-chairman of the Lancashire Police Federation, said police officers could face the problem of ‘malicious allegations’.

She said: “I strongly believe that all cases are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated.

“In my experience the CPS make no allowances for the fact the accused is a police officer and substantiated cases are taken to CPS, which is quite right.

“Resigning does not mean an officer escapes prosecution, although you have to remember that the burden of proof in misconduct cases is much lower than the criminal standard, which is why you may see officers facing misconduct proceedings, but not criminal proceedings.

Supt Martyn Leveridge, head of Lancashire’s professional standards department, said: “We take complaints of this nature very seriously and have a duty to thoroughly investigate any allegations made to us.

"The public quite rightly demands very high standards of its police service, and we are aiming to consistently deliver a service that meets those expectations.”

Pendle MP Andrew Stephenson said he had raised the issue of police officers accused of any crime in Parliament following the conviction of Nelson officer Salim Razaq, who ran an organised crime gang.

He said: “I asked for statistics of how many officers are accused of crimes and how many are convicted and was told those statistics are not kept.

“I am shocked at these new figures as any officer accused of a crime should undergo the same legal process anyone else would.

"Any suggestion that it can be handled away from the courts is wrong.”

Comments(17)

alan7554 says...
8:01am Mon 17 Jan 11

well say no more,money talks and being in the police force works, total disgrace and they get away with it

Manuel Hung says...
8:18am Mon 17 Jan 11

May be the East Lancs MP championing this is only doing it to deflect attention away from all the things that MP's get up to.
.
IF you want a bunch of corrupt deviants who abuse their position you don't have to look any further than MP's.
.
MP's should get their own house in order first!!

adamdesk says...
9:11am Mon 17 Jan 11

people say IPCC are independant ?

No there not they have they own people working there

IPCC supports police despite being in fault

Justice system for police: forgive them in any event

burner says...
9:14am Mon 17 Jan 11

Failing to procecute is not very PC, is it? Now reveal figures regarding driving offences - go on, dares you!

coxy78 says...
11:08am Mon 17 Jan 11

certain police officers, only a minority are no better than the common criminal!!!Most do a great job but a lot are only police officers for the power they have. One of my best mates is a police officer and some of the stuff that he tells me is unbelievable!!!!!!

chris283 says...
11:52am Mon 17 Jan 11

send um down thats wat i say there no different just cause they av a uniform

Gaz M says...
11:57am Mon 17 Jan 11

I am afraid it,s the day and age we now live in . The days of Dixon of dock green are long gone! we have also past the days of the sweeny!soon be the day of the robocop maybe then our citizens can be relatively safe.

Lifeinthemix says...
12:28pm Mon 17 Jan 11

There is only one solution, a solution that we have had in this nation since 635AD...common law.
.
Clearly the constabularies are not acting under the constitutional mandate, therefore we must express our common law rights to self defence, the protection of our property and shackles, our duty as a citizen to make citizen arrests of all who are breaking the law of the land, this has to include any and all statute officers as by definition of their title, they are acting contrary to the law of the land.
.
Constables here my plea, you are not officers.
.
I think the first step in this direction would be to debate with our constables in order we can let them know we fully support their role as peace constables in the upkeep of our constitution, we do not support their actions in supporting statute law in all its forms. It needs to be made clear, only those holding office under 'Oath' under the constitutional mandate are mandated to operate our laws, and more importantly they can only act within their office under the oath they have sworn. This is how the country works, it clearly does not work under statutes...
.
Real constables need the people, the people need the constabulary. If this situation on which the corporate crown and governments continue to act unlawfully and outside the constitution, then civil unrest is the only conclusion, the police will become nothing more than a strong arm of the European forces already trained by the Northern Irish Intelligence groups.
.
Under this reality all ideas of the British Constitution will be but a distant memory, and one I doubt will ever return to the world under corporate statute dictatorship.
.
We are all set to lose as this game moves on, therefore what have we to lose in moving to lawful rebellion?
.
None compliance with this statute system is our right under common law, pay no more tax as our ancestors formed for us in order times such as these may be opposed.
.
Unfortunately lawful rebellion requires the people to lawfully rebel, now is not a time to take a back seat, we each need each other before the real jack boot ensures we are divided at grass roots level as people say nothing and do nothing as they pick us off one by one.
.
You know what I write is the truth of the matter, we are at the last chance saloon in this regard...

bankhall says...
12:59pm Mon 17 Jan 11

why the surprise that none is ever charged ??????

Ian123xyz says...
4:57pm Mon 17 Jan 11

There are so many new laws now, covering every area of activity that it isn't that surprising that people fall foul of them from time to time. 4000+ were introduced by the last government. At the same time most of their MPs had their fingers in the public till to varying degrees. What used to be regarded as work place banter could now easily result in someone being charged with one offence or another. Conspiracy theorists could be forgiven for believing that the real aim is increasing governmental control over the population as a whole.

Lifeinthemix says...
6:40pm Mon 17 Jan 11

Ian123xyz
.
The simple fact is the labour government did produce some 4600 new statutes during its years of treason, they are certainly not laws, which can only be brought fourth with full consent of the people and then royal ascent, not the corporate royal ascent, the office of monarch...

tim83 says...
7:13pm Mon 17 Jan 11

We live in a police state,these facts prove it the police get away with murder,literally.

Lifeinthemix says...
8:27pm Mon 17 Jan 11

so we turn this around in the proper manner....her is the only mandate under which the constabulary can act :
.
“I, … of … do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.”
.
Understand that when it speaks of the queen it does so in relation to the office of monarch not the queen herself.
.
The statute hell being implemented comes from the queen herself as the consequence of the insider dealing the British Crown has given. One is the constitutional office, the other a private corporate empire, and one aspect to the slave trader families international banking cartel.
.

darwen sense says...
8:29pm Mon 17 Jan 11

Usual over reaction from some readers. Example being tim83, now accusing police officers of literally getting away with murders. Any evidence of this tim? Typical LET for their cheap sensationising journalism too. All this story shows is that we have a democratic system that allows such transparency of investigations. The stats reflect "accusations" not always being fact. The police are a golden ticket for some people to make things up. The compensation they could get, and as well as the fact that they probably have a crim record themselves! People should remember that CPS will have to have a realistic prospect of a conviction, or else why waste tax payers money on a trial. Thats the standard they apply to every case, so why make it different for police cases. Just to appease the anti establishment/conspi
racy theorists!

Chris P Bacon says...
8:36pm Mon 17 Jan 11

Lifeinthemix wrote:
Ian123xyz
.
The simple fact is the labour government did produce some 4600 new statutes during its years of treason, they are certainly not laws, which can only be brought fourth with full consent of the people and then royal ascent, not the corporate royal ascent, the office of monarch...
The Royal Ascent? Where are the Royals climbing?

Getting it wrong once is understandable but twice shows you really don't know the difference between 'ascent' and 'assent'.

Lifeinthemix says...
8:38pm Mon 17 Jan 11

darwen sense
.
The Brazilian underground electrician murdered in fact executed in front of a terrified London underground mass of people after the 77 bombings.
.
John Gardener during the 1990's...need I go on.
.
It is not so much the police per say, it is special units within the police made so on the back of the arming of our police, in the main populated by ex special forces and marksmen.

Chris P Bacon says...
9:54pm Mon 17 Jan 11

Lifeinthemix wrote:
darwen sense
.
The Brazilian underground electrician murdered in fact executed in front of a terrified London underground mass of people after the 77 bombings.
.
John Gardener during the 1990's...need I go on.
.
It is not so much the police per say, it is special units within the police made so on the back of the arming of our police, in the main populated by ex special forces and marksmen.
No comma where required, most of us will be unaware of the 77 bombings you refer to (IN 77 or in number?), no apostrophe required after the 0 in 1990s, it's per se not 'per say', that's meaningless.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree