News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


LT block logo JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

'Huge' carbon footprint of East Lancashire’s public buildings


COUNCIL bosses have been accused of hypocrisy over climate change after the ‘huge’ carbon footprint of East Lancashire’s publicly-owned buildings was revealed.

The Lancashire Telegraph has discovered that almost half of the area’s town halls, council offices, police stations and health centres have been given poor energy efficiency ratings.

And 20 were given the worst possible score for the amount of carbon dioxide they let out – leading environmentalists to call for the public sector to ‘practise what it preaches’.

Bosses said they were doing all they could to be more efficient and many have signed up to a pledge to cut their carbon output by 10 per cent this year.

Some of the older buildings, like 19th-century town halls, are hard to insulate, but the £113million Royal Blackburn Hospital, opened in 2006, was given the second worst possible rating while 1960s council office blocks also fared badly.

Brian Jackson, of the East Lancashire branch of Friends of the Earth, said: “This is certainly embarrassing.

"If you really want people to be environmentally conscious, and energy efficient, you have got to set an example.

“We are pouring energy into these buildings just to keep warm. It’s not only hypocritical: we are paying for it.”

A raft of headline-grabbing environmental measures, including turning streetlights off at night, carbon offsetting in Uganda and encouraging towns to go ‘plastic bag free’ have come from East Lancashire’s councils in recent years.

But a total of 54 out of the 113 public buildings scored below average for energy efficiency.

Matthew Sinclair, research director at the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “With councils preaching to local people left right and centre they really ought to get their own houses in order.”

Buildings are given a score and a rating between A and G in the government ranking system introduced in 2008.

Among those given the worst possible ‘G’ rating, for scores over 150, were Darwen and Accrington market halls, Bangor Street community centre in Blackburn, Temple Street Resource Centre in Burnley, Clitheroe Castle Museum and county council-run care homes including in Accrington and Rossendale.

The headquarters of Blackburn with Darwen council’s environment department, Davyfield Road, was rated G.

The 1969 ‘tower block’ extension to Blackburn town hall in King William Street is also given the bottom score, faring even worse than its neighbour, opened in 1856, which was given an F rating.

But by far the biggest carbon footprint went to the County Record Office in Preston, which scored 429 - more than four times the average.

Lancashire County Council said the building needed to use special ‘climate control’ technology to preserve the ancient documents, which wasn’t taken into account by the rating system.

Rawtenstall, Blackburn and Accrington police stations were also rated below average, as was Montague Health centre.

Burnley hospital was given a ‘D’ rating, faring better than Royal Blackburn.

Hazel Harding, who chairs East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, said she would investigate the high emissions from the flagship Blackburn hospital.

She said: “I am surprised because with PFI buildings you would expect them to be as efficient as possible.

“I would like to see us using as little energy as possible. It’s a prized commodity.”

None of the buildings were given the best possible ‘A’ grade, but there was a handful of ‘B’-rated buildings.

The total gas bill for Lancashire County Council’s 19th century headquarters in Preston in 2008/09 was £198,000.

In Blackburn, the town hall cost £17,972 to heat and the annual bill for the tower block was £19,808.

Blackburn wid Darwen executive member for the environment Coun Alan Cottam said: “The council is committed to tackling climate change and reducing our carbon footprint, both in terms of saving the planet and also saving taxpayers money.”

Matthew Tidmarsh, County Hall’s chief engineer, said: “We take our responsibility to save energy very seriously and are already investing in measures to make our buildings more energy-efficient.”

>>FIVE OF THE WORST

Lancashire Record Office
Blackburn Town Hall
Whitworth Civic Hall
Accrington Market Hall
Burnley Contact Centre.

>>FIVE OF THE BEST

Nelson Town Hall
King George’s Hall, Blackburn
Burnley Mechanics
Oswaldtwistle Civic Theatre
Police HQ, Hutton.

Comments(10)

Mikeee47 says...
10:58am Mon 22 Mar 10

There is now less carbon dioxide being emmited from the UK than there was in the early 50s & 60s, and still no evidence that it's harmful to the plannet, if you need to make a difference, Countries like China, Russia, Canada, USA, are massive compared to our tiny island, look at the polutents they throw into the atmospere, wake up do the UK really make that much of a difference? I'm all for conservation , but come on people wake up, look at the bigger picture.

Izanears says...
11:48am Mon 22 Mar 10

Couple of points. Several weeks ago I reported a street light that was lit 24/7. I was assured that something would be done. The only problem was they never said WHEN!
I read recently that the Government has purchased £60 million pounds of Carbon Credits from a middle east country so that it did not have to cut back on travel/transport etc for the forthcoming election. I have written to Gordon Prentice asking him to explain how these Carbon Credits work. So far I not had a reply.

Mikeee47 says...
12:38pm Mon 22 Mar 10

A Carbon credit is a generic term meaning that a value has been assigned to a reduction or offset of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon credits and markets are key components of national and international attempts to mitigate the growth in concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One carbon credit is equal to one ton of carbon dioxide, or in some markets, carbon dioxide equivalent gases. Carbon trading is an application of an emissions trading approach. Greenhouse gas emissions are capped and then markets are used to allocate the emissions among the group of regulated sources. The goal is to allow market mechanisms to drive industrial and commercial processes in the direction of low emissions or less carbon intensive approaches than those used when there is no cost to emitting carbon dioxide and other GHGs into the atmosphere. Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world.

There are also many companies that sell carbon credits to commercial and individual customers who are interested in lowering their carbon footprint on a voluntary basis. These carbon offsetters purchase the credits from an investment fund or a carbon development company that has aggregated the credits from individual projects. The quality of the credits is based in part on the validation process and sophistication of the fund or development company that acted as the sponsor to the carbon project. This is reflected in their price; voluntary units typically have less value than the units sold through the rigorously-validated Clean Development Mechanism.

Izanears says...
1:10pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Thankyou Mikeee. All I can say after reading your very interesting post is (A) jobs for the boys) (B) more money for fat cats, and (C) a big confidence trick.

pull some strings says...
1:48pm Mon 22 Mar 10

As Mikeee indicates, without the other 'bigger' countries doing anything, the CO2 we produce is like a **** in outer space!

It's all a con by Gordon Brown and his cronies to implement yet more stealth taxes to fund his economic failures.

MerlinTheVoiceofReason says...
4:50pm Mon 22 Mar 10

ENERGY = ££££££££;
Saving energy = saving money.
What's the big deal? Surely, it's a no brainer. The sooner these inefficiencies are addressed the better.
Those who take the cynical view re. climate change really are missing the point!

Chris P Bacon says...
5:22pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Izanears wrote:
Couple of points. Several weeks ago I reported a street light that was lit 24/7. I was assured that something would be done. The only problem was they never said WHEN!
I read recently that the Government has purchased £60 million pounds of Carbon Credits from a middle east country so that it did not have to cut back on travel/transport etc for the forthcoming election. I have written to Gordon Prentice asking him to explain how these Carbon Credits work. So far I not had a reply.
Interesting. I sent an e-mailed question to Gordon Prentice about a year ago and it took him three months to reply to it and the reply he sent was so far removed from the question I'd actually asked, it rendered his response worthless. He can wait three months for my vote after the election as well!

Lifeinthemix says...
1:28am Tue 23 Mar 10

And remember folks; man made climate change linked to the release of CO2.....
.
IS A FRAUD
.
Tax and more tax is the whole basis for climate panic.....and of course to completely de-industrialise the Western nations so we buy only Chinese plastic fantastic.
.
I mean even the nuts and bolts used in Chinese made products are made from blotting paper, and they expect the Christmas bought bicycles to last longer than lunch time Christmas day.....
.
But of course not a penny is lost to the international bankers, they own China and India toooooooo

DavidBurnley says...
11:05am Tue 23 Mar 10

When the building mentioned were built (mostly historic), I'm sure they were not designed to be 'carbon efficient' or 'carbon neutral'. I can't imagine the Normans arrving in Clitheroe in the early 1100s were too bothered about such things when building the castle.

I doubt the world will stop turning, suddenly flood or be blown apart by excessively high winds because Clitheroe Castle and Accy market hall are not as carbon efficient as newly built monstrosities. But at least it gives people something to worry about rather than the real problems this country/continent/wo
rld* are facing. I think climate change is mainly a deflection technique to prevent people worrying about what really matters.


* delete as appropriate!

ghost of sceptic says...
2:52pm Tue 23 Mar 10

yes but you are missing a massive point davidburnley, clitheroe castle museum ect has recently had a massive refurbishment so there is no excuse.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses