News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


LT block logo JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Probes into 5 Lancashire child deaths kept secret


HEALTH watchdogs have attacked the ‘secrecy’ surrounding neglect probes after it emerged at least seven Lancashire children had died as a result of suspected abuse.

Reports into whether these children – and another five who were seriously injured – were adequately protect- ed by statutory bodies were compiled following investigations.

The findings are meant to be made public, but the results of only three of these reviews led by Lancashire county and Blackburn with Darwen councils are available.

Health watchdogs and an politicians said ‘secrecy’ meant they were not able to monitor how social services, health bodies, schools and police were protecting these at risk children.

Figures obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph show that Lancashire County Council has ordered serious case reviews into eight children - five who have died and three who have been seriously injured - since 2007.

Blackburn with Darwen Council has begun four serious case reviews since the beginning of 2007, with three still ongoing. One, investigating a child death, was started just weeks ago.

The reviews, conducted by members of council, health, education and police agencies, are undertaken only when a child has died or been seriously injured, and abuse or neglect is known or suspected to have been a factor.

Social services departments' ability to protect children from serious harm has come under the spotlight after the death of Baby P in Haringey, after months of horrific abuse which was not spotted by social workers or hospital doctors.

Blackburn's health watchdog Coun Roy Davies attacked the "culture of secrecy" which he said made it hard for even elected representatives to scrutinise services.

Coun Davies said: “The numbers are worrying, but the fact is that we don't know how worrying, because you can't find out anything that's going on.

"We are told as councillors that the social services departments are doing things right and that's the end of the matter.

“I've been on the council a long time and still have no idea how these people work and what their criteria are for stepping up involvement in a child at risk, but it's not for want of trying.”

Executive summaries of serious case reviews published by Blackburn with Darwen Council include the case of Naseem Patel, who died in the care of foster parents in March 2007.

His mother had poisoned him with a huge dose of paracetamol three years before, when he was just eight weeks old, and the long-term damage led to his death.

In another case, a review was ordered after a two-month-old baby suffered a badly broken arm.

Lancashire County Council has published the executive summary of only one review report on the internet - into the death of Burnley's Adam Rickwood, 14, who hanged himself at the Hassockfield young offenders' centre in 2004, becoming the youngest person ever to die in UK custody.

The 2008 government ratings place Blackburn with Darwen Council's services as "good", while Lancashire County Council's was rated "adequate".

Both councils have faced criticism over their fostering services, for failing to carry out checks on carers.

Laurence Loft, chairman of Blackburn with Darwen Local Safeguarding Board (LSCB), said: "The safety and well being of all children and young people is our first priority and because of that, we are very proactive on this issue.”

Ellis Friedman, director of public health at NHS East Lancashire and chairman of the East Lancashire LSCB, added: "Serious case reviews are designed to hold us to account by investigating the actions of every agency involved in the life of a child who has died or been seriously injured.

“It's important to remember that not all of these cases represents a serious failing."

County Hall chiefs said the large area Lancashire covered meant more serious incidents were inevitable, adding that they were in the bottom half of North West authorities for numbers of incidents per 10,000 children.

Helen Davies, Lancashire County Council's executive director for children, defended her service. She said: "Thankfully incidents involving serious injury or death of children where abuse or neglect is a factor are relatively rare, but we take each one very seriously indeed. If there are any recommendations for change then we would look to learn those lessons immediately.”

Blackburn MP Jack Straw said he had "Never seen evidence that Blackburn with Darwen is not acting in anything other than a professional and responsible way to protect children who are at risk."

He added: "Some parents can be highly manipulative and avoid being found out.”

Comments(12)

Finger Bang says...
10:31am Wed 15 Apr 09

Burnley Council leader Gordon Birtwistle attacked "gross underfunding and understaffing" for social workers.

How's about this for a suggestion then Gord - maybe just maybe don't vote yourself and your cronies at the top offensively huge pay rises, and spend the money on social care instead.

Not going to happen of course, but don't come to us bleating about underfunding when there is such a disgusting fat cat culture going on at the top of councils.

drughater says...
6:27pm Wed 15 Apr 09

Every day there are comments about social services and the lack of ability to maintain there remit of protecting vulnerable persons in there care, WHY.
Comments above mention, Its a large area to police and even our elected members cannot find out case details due to secrecy and worst of all,checks on carers are not always carried out.
The BandD social services were rated a only GOOD in a recent report, how on earth is that acceptable to the people alleged to be in there care.
The possible link up with the NHS is seen as a step foreward in order to improve the service, is this meant as a joke.

l m h jones says...
8:47pm Wed 15 Apr 09

i wonder if the upcoming public events to discuss the proposed new care plus for blackburn with darwen pct and social care might give the public an opportunity to ask some questions around accountability?

drughater says...
10:12pm Wed 15 Apr 09

Accountability, Plausible deny ability is more like it.
Over the last few months , questions have been asked and Elected members lobbied with regard to BandD social services and due to so called secrecy, the public have been denied answers.
More people need to ask questions ,now, and not be fobbed off with, not in the public interest to know. We the public, denied answers,are the people who elect Councilors and pay council taxes in order to fund the services to which we are denied access, is this democracy.

Political Watch says...
11:59pm Wed 15 Apr 09

The article states:

“Figures obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph show that Lancashire County Council has ordered serious case reviews into eight children - five who have died and three who have been seriously injured - since 2007.”

There is adequate mechanism for enquiry into these cases. The Coroner has a duty to enquire into all suspicious deaths and there should be no secrecy, whatsoever. Certainly if there is one iota of suspicion the Chief Constable should initiate investigations. Elected Councillors have no role in the matter, although they should call upon the police and Coroner to carry out their duties. The Social Services Department has no investigative experience and should merely be treated as witnesses to what has occurred. Obviously Blackburn with Darwen Council has no appreciation of the correct procedures, they frequently exceed their legitimate authority.


JUSTAMUM says...
3:51am Thu 16 Apr 09

Accountability will only arrive with transparency in and out of the courtrooms.Jack Straw has hoodwinked the public into thinking that from the 27th April the courts will in fact be more transparent, but if you take a closer look you will agree with the lawyers and the judges that in fact it will create greater restrictions...eg, Parents that feel they have suffered a miscarriage of justice will no longer be able to seek out the press as the websters did...

JUSTAMUM says...
4:06am Thu 16 Apr 09

Its in the publics interest to see justice being done..it is also in the publics interest to be aware of the huge number of decent parents that have suffered grave miscarriages of justice.....have you any idea how many parents feel deceived and robbed by the family courts ? No... you couldnt possibly, they are all gagged by the courts ,emotionally and mentally these parents go through a living hell without their children.
The publics faith in the family courts is non existent, fabricated reports stand uncorrected, blatant perjury ignored,Cafcass simply a replica of the Sw present, multiple conflicts of interest, cosy relationships, expert witnesses stepping out of their specialism,(but can never get it wrong),collusion between all parties and your own lawyer is the norm,children s true feelings ignored,profound impact on parents health ignored,we know that the childs best interests is a cover for the fact the courts dont care, it is a conveyor belt system that squeezes as much money out of the parents and child as it possibly can. Within those corrupt walls a parent loses all credibility before they enter the courtroom. So please excuse us if we: avoid A&E depts, (websters) dont complain to often to GP re:childs ailments, (MSBP/FII) admit to being depressed,(child removed) ask for assistance as disabled, (child removed) admit to smacking child (child removed)admit to abusive childhood (child removed)

pregnant mothers just flee the country, as the UK is no place for children.
Thanks to the nanny state we are coached how to bring our children up,the corporate parent still thinks it can do a better job than natural, though seemingly imperfect parents....though it fails the childs needs so miserably.Now the government struggles to contain the monster it has created and finds itself now reaping what it has sewn for too many years...

stealer says...
8:53am Thu 16 Apr 09

The Social Services
staff are on a hiding to nothing!
A great deal of child
abuse is likely to be
hidden by the abuser!
Only when the abuse
becomes obvious might
the Soc Svcs become aware! Abusers are
devious and investigation of them
must be extremely
difficult at an early
stage of suspicion!
Many 'front line'
workers may be ill
equipped/under-train
ed to spot abuse or deal,with an abuser,authoritative
ly!
Line Management will in some instances make misjudgement of
reported suspicions.
In an ideal world
mistakes would not be made,but then,in the same ideal world
nor would there be any abuse!!
Obviously the authorities must make the initial enquiries, in house.
Any subsequent action has got to be based on the findings. It may not
always be a matter of public interest to report openly,
dependent on many factors.
It is always sad to read/hear of extreme
cases but such cases
are rare and although
we must not make excuses for obvious
failure to act,it should not be thought that failure is the norm!!

tccharmer says...
11:18am Thu 16 Apr 09

Political Watch wrote:
The article states:

“Figures obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph show that Lancashire County Council has ordered serious case reviews into eight children - five who have died and three who have been seriously injured - since 2007.”

There is adequate mechanism for enquiry into these cases. The Coroner has a duty to enquire into all suspicious deaths and there should be no secrecy, whatsoever. Certainly if there is one iota of suspicion the Chief Constable should initiate investigations. Elected Councillors have no role in the matter, although they should call upon the police and Coroner to carry out their duties. The Social Services Department has no investigative experience and should merely be treated as witnesses to what has occurred. Obviously Blackburn with Darwen Council has no appreciation of the correct procedures, they frequently exceed their legitimate authority.

I concur fully with your comments and find the last paragraph quite an indictment of BandD social services professionalism.



JUSTAMUM says...
5:24pm Thu 16 Apr 09

stealer : 'In an ideal world mistakes would not be made,
but then,in the same ideal world nor would there be any abuse!!
Obviously the authorities must make the initial enquiries, in house.
Any subsequent action has got to be based on the findings. It may not
always be a matter of public interest to report openly,
dependent on many factors.
It is always sad to read/hear of extreme cases but such cases
are rare'

It is one thing to make mistakes but quite another to conceal
truths,this is nothing to do with ideology.
However in the current climate of child proceedings behind
closed doors and in secrecy it is difficult to appreciate the full
scale of injustice. Their are thousands of cases
pending a hearing, backlogged at the ECHR. Mistakes as you
put it are many, at what point do mistakes become such a regular
occurrence that they become a scandalous testament of the
broken down and dysfunctional system. Extreme cases of injustice
are not rare, it is simply that parents are bound by the courts
not to speak about what happened within the courtroom, or they
will be sent to prison. This creates a culture of safety for all
concerned involved in a case, if they are to be dishonest,
malicious or simply inaccurate they know the public will never
get to find out.

stealer says...
11:25pm Thu 16 Apr 09

Justamum. If your statements are based on first hand info, I bow to your knowledge!
It astounds me that
no-one is allowed recourse if there are grounds for claim
of injustice!
That there are thousands of,as yet,
uninvestigated or investigated and
awaiting decision seems incredulous!

JUSTAMUM says...
6:26pm Sat 18 Apr 09

I wish it wasnt true but it is stealer,there are many groups of parents on the net that help each other get through the nightmare of losing their children. The preconception that only violence and abusive parents is not true. Many have lost children on the strength of hearsay or based upon the opinion of a sworker or expert witness...
Of course one can complain to the GMC in the experts case but I think you will find it to be extremely rare for an expert witness to be persued.They take care of their own.
Independent bodies we find are penultimately not independent or there can be huge conflicts of interest. Of course non of this matters as we are not allowed to speak of what has transpired within the courts.
Appeals are refused usually this is why once every feasible course of action has been exhausted in the uk it ends up in Strasbourg.


AT RISK: Monitoring of some suspected victims has been kept secret AT RISK: Monitoring of some suspected victims has been kept secret

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses