Probes into 5 Lancashire child deaths kept secret (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Probes into 5 Lancashire child deaths kept secret
9:10am Wednesday 15th April 2009 in News
By Camilla Sutcliffe
AT RISK: Monitoring of some suspected victims has been kept secret
HEALTH watchdogs have attacked the ‘secrecy’ surrounding neglect probes after it emerged at least seven Lancashire children had died as a result of suspected abuse.
Reports into whether these children – and another five who were seriously injured – were adequately protect- ed by statutory bodies were compiled following investigations.
The findings are meant to be made public, but the results of only three of these reviews led by Lancashire county and Blackburn with Darwen councils are available.
Health watchdogs and an politicians said ‘secrecy’ meant they were not able to monitor how social services, health bodies, schools and police were protecting these at risk children.
Figures obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph show that Lancashire County Council has ordered serious case reviews into eight children - five who have died and three who have been seriously injured - since 2007.
Blackburn with Darwen Council has begun four serious case reviews since the beginning of 2007, with three still ongoing. One, investigating a child death, was started just weeks ago.
The reviews, conducted by members of council, health, education and police agencies, are undertaken only when a child has died or been seriously injured, and abuse or neglect is known or suspected to have been a factor.
Social services departments' ability to protect children from serious harm has come under the spotlight after the death of Baby P in Haringey, after months of horrific abuse which was not spotted by social workers or hospital doctors.
Blackburn's health watchdog Coun Roy Davies attacked the "culture of secrecy" which he said made it hard for even elected representatives to scrutinise services.
Coun Davies said: “The numbers are worrying, but the fact is that we don't know how worrying, because you can't find out anything that's going on.
"We are told as councillors that the social services departments are doing things right and that's the end of the matter.
“I've been on the council a long time and still have no idea how these people work and what their criteria are for stepping up involvement in a child at risk, but it's not for want of trying.”
Executive summaries of serious case reviews published by Blackburn with Darwen Council include the case of Naseem Patel, who died in the care of foster parents in March 2007.
His mother had poisoned him with a huge dose of paracetamol three years before, when he was just eight weeks old, and the long-term damage led to his death.
In another case, a review was ordered after a two-month-old baby suffered a badly broken arm.
Lancashire County Council has published the executive summary of only one review report on the internet - into the death of Burnley's Adam Rickwood, 14, who hanged himself at the Hassockfield young offenders' centre in 2004, becoming the youngest person ever to die in UK custody.
The 2008 government ratings place Blackburn with Darwen Council's services as "good", while Lancashire County Council's was rated "adequate".
Both councils have faced criticism over their fostering services, for failing to carry out checks on carers.
Laurence Loft, chairman of Blackburn with Darwen Local Safeguarding Board (LSCB), said: "The safety and well being of all children and young people is our first priority and because of that, we are very proactive on this issue.”
Ellis Friedman, director of public health at NHS East Lancashire and chairman of the East Lancashire LSCB, added: "Serious case reviews are designed to hold us to account by investigating the actions of every agency involved in the life of a child who has died or been seriously injured.
“It's important to remember that not all of these cases represents a serious failing."
County Hall chiefs said the large area Lancashire covered meant more serious incidents were inevitable, adding that they were in the bottom half of North West authorities for numbers of incidents per 10,000 children.
Helen Davies, Lancashire County Council's executive director for children, defended her service. She said: "Thankfully incidents involving serious injury or death of children where abuse or neglect is a factor are relatively rare, but we take each one very seriously indeed. If there are any recommendations for change then we would look to learn those lessons immediately.”
Blackburn MP Jack Straw said he had "Never seen evidence that Blackburn with Darwen is not acting in anything other than a professional and responsible way to protect children who are at risk."
He added: "Some parents can be highly manipulative and avoid being found out.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (12)
10:31am Wed 15 Apr 09
Finger Bang says...
How's about this for a suggestion then Gord - maybe just maybe don't vote yourself and your cronies at the top offensively huge pay rises, and spend the money on social care instead.
Not going to happen of course, but don't come to us bleating about underfunding when there is such a disgusting fat cat culture going on at the top of councils.
6:27pm Wed 15 Apr 09
drughater says...
Comments above mention, Its a large area to police and even our elected members cannot find out case details due to secrecy and worst of all,checks on carers are not always carried out.
The BandD social services were rated a only GOOD in a recent report, how on earth is that acceptable to the people alleged to be in there care.
The possible link up with the NHS is seen as a step foreward in order to improve the service, is this meant as a joke.
8:47pm Wed 15 Apr 09
l m h jones says...
10:12pm Wed 15 Apr 09
drughater says...
Over the last few months , questions have been asked and Elected members lobbied with regard to BandD social services and due to so called secrecy, the public have been denied answers.
More people need to ask questions ,now, and not be fobbed off with, not in the public interest to know. We the public, denied answers,are the people who elect Councilors and pay council taxes in order to fund the services to which we are denied access, is this democracy.
11:59pm Wed 15 Apr 09
Political Watch says...
“Figures obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph show that Lancashire County Council has ordered serious case reviews into eight children - five who have died and three who have been seriously injured - since 2007.”
There is adequate mechanism for enquiry into these cases. The Coroner has a duty to enquire into all suspicious deaths and there should be no secrecy, whatsoever. Certainly if there is one iota of suspicion the Chief Constable should initiate investigations. Elected Councillors have no role in the matter, although they should call upon the police and Coroner to carry out their duties. The Social Services Department has no investigative experience and should merely be treated as witnesses to what has occurred. Obviously Blackburn with Darwen Council has no appreciation of the correct procedures, they frequently exceed their legitimate authority.
3:51am Thu 16 Apr 09
JUSTAMUM says...
4:06am Thu 16 Apr 09
JUSTAMUM says...
The publics faith in the family courts is non existent, fabricated reports stand uncorrected, blatant perjury ignored,Cafcass simply a replica of the Sw present, multiple conflicts of interest, cosy relationships, expert witnesses stepping out of their specialism,(but can never get it wrong),collusion between all parties and your own lawyer is the norm,children s true feelings ignored,profound impact on parents health ignored,we know that the childs best interests is a cover for the fact the courts dont care, it is a conveyor belt system that squeezes as much money out of the parents and child as it possibly can. Within those corrupt walls a parent loses all credibility before they enter the courtroom. So please excuse us if we: avoid A&E depts, (websters) dont complain to often to GP re:childs ailments, (MSBP/FII) admit to being depressed,(child removed) ask for assistance as disabled, (child removed) admit to smacking child (child removed)admit to abusive childhood (child removed)
pregnant mothers just flee the country, as the UK is no place for children.
Thanks to the nanny state we are coached how to bring our children up,the corporate parent still thinks it can do a better job than natural, though seemingly imperfect parents....though it fails the childs needs so miserably.Now the government struggles to contain the monster it has created and finds itself now reaping what it has sewn for too many years...
8:53am Thu 16 Apr 09
stealer says...
staff are on a hiding to nothing!
A great deal of child
abuse is likely to be
hidden by the abuser!
Only when the abuse
becomes obvious might
the Soc Svcs become aware! Abusers are
devious and investigation of them
must be extremely
difficult at an early
stage of suspicion!
Many 'front line'
workers may be ill
equipped/under-train
ed to spot abuse or deal,with an abuser,authoritative
ly!
Line Management will in some instances make misjudgement of
reported suspicions.
In an ideal world
mistakes would not be made,but then,in the same ideal world
nor would there be any abuse!!
Obviously the authorities must make the initial enquiries, in house.
Any subsequent action has got to be based on the findings. It may not
always be a matter of public interest to report openly,
dependent on many factors.
It is always sad to read/hear of extreme
cases but such cases
are rare and although
we must not make excuses for obvious
failure to act,it should not be thought that failure is the norm!!
11:18am Thu 16 Apr 09
tccharmer says...
5:24pm Thu 16 Apr 09
JUSTAMUM says...
but then,in the same ideal world nor would there be any abuse!!
Obviously the authorities must make the initial enquiries, in house.
Any subsequent action has got to be based on the findings. It may not
always be a matter of public interest to report openly,
dependent on many factors.
It is always sad to read/hear of extreme cases but such cases
are rare'
It is one thing to make mistakes but quite another to conceal
truths,this is nothing to do with ideology.
However in the current climate of child proceedings behind
closed doors and in secrecy it is difficult to appreciate the full
scale of injustice. Their are thousands of cases
pending a hearing, backlogged at the ECHR. Mistakes as you
put it are many, at what point do mistakes become such a regular
occurrence that they become a scandalous testament of the
broken down and dysfunctional system. Extreme cases of injustice
are not rare, it is simply that parents are bound by the courts
not to speak about what happened within the courtroom, or they
will be sent to prison. This creates a culture of safety for all
concerned involved in a case, if they are to be dishonest,
malicious or simply inaccurate they know the public will never
get to find out.
11:25pm Thu 16 Apr 09
stealer says...
It astounds me that
no-one is allowed recourse if there are grounds for claim
of injustice!
That there are thousands of,as yet,
uninvestigated or investigated and
awaiting decision seems incredulous!
6:26pm Sat 18 Apr 09
JUSTAMUM says...
Of course one can complain to the GMC in the experts case but I think you will find it to be extremely rare for an expert witness to be persued.They take care of their own.
Independent bodies we find are penultimately not independent or there can be huge conflicts of interest. Of course non of this matters as we are not allowed to speak of what has transpired within the courts.
Appeals are refused usually this is why once every feasible course of action has been exhausted in the uk it ends up in Strasbourg.