News RSS Feed


REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Gynaecology operations in cabin on Burnley hospital car park

8:50am Tuesday 18th November 2008

comment Comments (13)   Have your say »


GYNAECOLOGY operations will be carried out in a cabin on a hospital car park to tackle bed shortages.

The move is to be launched in a bid to free up space to treat “unprecedented” numbers of A&E patients.

To make room for new A&E beds, a gynaecology theatre and 22-bed ward at the Royal Blackburn Hospital closed yesterday.

A portable cabin is to be built on the Burnley General Hospital car park to treat gynaecology patients from all over East Lancashire.

But this will take three weeks to construct. No planned gynaecology will take place during this time, although emergency cases will still be treated at the Royal Blackburn.

In the meantime, A&E at the Royal will get the benefit of the gynaecology staff across the three weeks.

A total of 15 gynaecology operations were called off yesterday (MON) and dozens more will be cancelled before work is complete.

Surgery to repair prolapse and incontinence, as well as investigative surgery and planned hysterectomies, will be carried out in the cabin, while the beds vacated in the move will be used for emergency patients.

The cabin will be used until a new £30 million women’s and newborns’ centre, which is being at Burnley General, opens in 2010 Bosses at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, which runs both Burnley General and the Royal Blackburn Hospital, said they had taken the unusual step in a bid to ease its beds crisis.

But a women’s health charity said the move was “unsatisfactory”, and Blackburn health watchdog Roy Davies said it was no substitute for the extra capacity needed.

Patrick Shervington, chief executive of national charity Women’s Health Concern, said: “This sounds unsatisfactory and does worry me, but the proof of the pudding will be what happens to the patients.

“There will certainly be some women who will be uncomfortable at the prospect, but temporary buildings can be made secure and private. The staff, as always, will make the real difference over whether or not this will work.”

Coun Davies, chairman of Blackburn with Darwen Council’s health scrutiny committee, said: “This is indicative of the real problems the hospital is having in coping with the extra patient numbers, and the fact is that we need more beds and more staff at the coal face.”

“Temporary measures is not the way to go about it, particularly when we are talking about such a sensitive branch of medicine.”

Pendle councillor Ann Kerrigan added: “There is so much going on and so much disarray at the moment, and the people need answers.”

The trust has seen patient numbers jump by 14 per cent in the past two years, leaving the hospitals on “red alert” for capacity for almost a third of the time.

Last Monday, the Royal Blackburn Hospital was forced to close its emergency department for three hours, as eight ambulances queued up outside, with 12 more on their way. Those patients had to be taken to hospitals including Bury, Rochdale and Airedale, 28 miles away.

And last week a GP Iain Ashworth slammed the hospital for ‘releasing patients too early’ and warned of ‘third world scenes’ if there was a flu pandemic.

Rineke Schram, medical director and consultant obstetrician for East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust said the move would help them deal with this “unprecedented demand” on A&E.

She said: “Once this additional operating theatre is in place, within two to three weeks, we do not anticipate needing to cancel any further gynaecology operations.

“Emergency gynaecology surgery is currently continuing to take place at Royal Blackburn Hospital as are gynaecology clinics, early pregnancy assessment and other specialist outpatient services.”

Staff on the ward said they were concerned for women’s health. One, who asked not to be identified, said: “We have gone from a 24 hour service to this. The staff are very angry. There are probably nine or 10 listed hysterectomies next week and we’ve no idea what we are supposed to be doing.

"I am just furious for the women.”

Blackburn’s Urgent Care Centre - the “walk-in” part of the traditional A and E - is housed in a similar structure to the temporary gynaecology building planned for Burnley.

.


Your Say YourLancashire Telegraph

Taztastic, Darwen says...
10:06am Tue 18 Nov 08

Move the Chief Executives office into a portacabin.
The office space can then be converted into a gynea unit.
After all, it's had years of experience housing ****'s

ewood.eddie, darwen says...
10:22am Tue 18 Nov 08

why don't the lancashire telegraph accept that they are part of the problem they don't report facts, thet scare-monger they should be telling patients to use the urgent care centres correctly, and explaining that A & E is for ambulance cases only, rather than judt criticising the hospitals, when patients are at fault.

A Darener, Darwen says...
11:26am Tue 18 Nov 08

They've got better facilities on the set of Holby.

Grizzly, Darwen says...
11:33am Tue 18 Nov 08

ewood.eddie wrote:
why don't the lancashire telegraph accept that they are part of the problem they don't report facts, thet scare-monger they should be telling patients to use the urgent care centres correctly, and explaining that A & E is for ambulance cases only, rather than judt criticising the hospitals, when patients are at fault.
I've never heard of the Urgent Care Centres. Perhaps the Hospital trust's PR needs addressing rather than attempting to lay the blame on the paper?

Care to elaborate how you conclude this is the fault of the patients........?


jjenkins, Burnley says...
11:39am Tue 18 Nov 08

When a mobile operating theatre was used at Burnley and Rossendale a few years ago, the papers thought it was an excellent idea to reduce waiting lists. Now the papers report it negatively. Again this shows the Telegraph poor reporting practices and contantly knocking the local health service.

If the hospital didn't provide this service then the papers would report that more services closed.

They just can't win.

Perhaps if the GP's and local politicians had done the complaining at the very begining instead of waiting till the day of closure before they protested then we wouldn't be in this mess.

Darren Reynolds, Burnley says...
12:50pm Tue 18 Nov 08

Perhaps if the GP's and local politicians had done the complaining at the very beginning

They did.

Or, many of them did. Certainly several GPs and local politicians I know personally.

Unfortunately the people who mattered the most were the County Councillors on the health scrutiny committee, chaired by Burnley County Coun Maureen Martin, and they decided there was nothing wrong with the plans.

That committee still thinks there's nothing wrong and refuses to refer the problems for independent investigation.

Karen Patton, Blackburn says...
12:57pm Tue 18 Nov 08

The whole merge of the hospitals is proving to be a nightmare. A&E services at Burnley should never have been closed and Gynaecology should be left where it is because they have top of the range theatre facilities on level 4 at Royal Blackburn Hospital. I was a Gynaecology patient for 5 years and since the merge the department has deteriorated in wards and beds. The hospital seem to be adding these portacabins on like its legoland and Gynaecology can involve alot of major surgery eg Hysterectomies. I think having these portacabins is making it look like third world treatment. Urgent Care centre shouldn't have to be in a portacabin after millions of pounds was spent enlarging the hospital. Patients lives are being put at risk and are suffering more alot because of this merge.

RAyzer, BURNLEY says...
4:02pm Tue 18 Nov 08

ewood.eddie wrote:
why don't the lancashire telegraph accept that they are part of the problem they don't report facts, thet scare-monger they should be telling patients to use the urgent care centres correctly, and explaining that A & E is for ambulance cases only, rather than judt criticising the hospitals, when patients are at fault.
what an idiot!!!patients are at fault!!!you need a brain transplant

RAyzer, BURNLEY says...
4:03pm Tue 18 Nov 08

1 group to blame..LABOUR!!!they
ve ruined the whole country...5 years ago youd of laughed at this headline..REALITY labour!!!!

Ian123xyz, Blackburn says...
9:44pm Tue 18 Nov 08

A buzz word is "change" and it doesnt seem to matter whether the "change" is for the better or not. Middle and senior management have a secure and well paid employment constantly introducing "change". "Change" has become an industry in its own right, often leaving chaos cynicism, and extravagant expenditure in its wake.

pendlereader, Pendle says...
11:15pm Tue 18 Nov 08


The problems in our hospitals in East Lancashire lay firmly at the door of the 'new Labour' government.

The plan to reduce the debt in NHS trusts across the country was to 'downgrade' A&E services and 'centralise' them in a super hospital.

At the same time, Labour re-introduced an old Conservative idea to allow the private sector to build hospitals then lease them back to government. In effect, the Labour government has gone from landowner to tennant under the old tory idea of 'private finance initiatives' (PFI).

The problems we are seeing are a product of empty promises that were implemented with no guarantee (no evidence that they would work).

When the A&E at Burnley was transferred to Blackburn, Labour's patient targets were also introduced. One target was to get A&E patients into a bed or theatre within 4 hours of being admitted to A&E. Another target was for the hospital consultants to see patients referred from their GP's within 18 weeks.

Removal of Burnley's A&E services, along with the aim to meet the 'targets' is the reason why there are so many problems.

There was no evidence that Labour's 'NHS plan' introduced in 2001 would work. And what we are seeing in East Lancashires hospitals is the result of this. The downgrading of Burnley's A&E was NOT clinician led as we are supposed to believe. Otherwise, thrombolysis (heart treatment injection treatment) would never have been removed from Burnley's A&E. And as we now know, thrombolysis treatment has been re-instated at Burnley hospital after pressure from,,,, clinicians!

What we are seeing is 'patchwork privatisation' of our NHS.

The NHS here in East Lancashire was never perfect in terms of finance before the reforms last year, but for this Labour government to sell off our valuable assests to private investors has resulted in a service that puts wealth before health.

The only way to resolve the problem is to share A&E services in East Lancashire between Blackburn hospital and Burnley hospital.

Contact your MP, tell kitty ussher (MP Burnley) to stick to her pledge to re-instate A&E at Burnley, tell Gordon Prentice (MP Pendle) he must also re-instate the A&E at Burnley.

If they disagree, vote them out at the next election. It's their new tory/labour party with it's 'NHS PLAN' that's caused this chaos in our hospitals.














lets debate, blackburn says...
1:29am Wed 19 Nov 08

ewood.eddie wrote:
why don't the lancashire telegraph accept that they are part of the problem they don't report facts, thet scare-monger they should be telling patients to use the urgent care centres correctly, and explaining that A & E is for ambulance cases only, rather than judt criticising the hospitals, when patients are at fault.
Ewood Eddie this problem has not been caused by the LET they have not reduced the number of beds provided, the Trust has,which is why the dedicated 22 bed gynaecology ward is now being used for patients that should have gone onto wards dealing in there specific illnesses,urgent care centers do not carry out planned major surgery,the cancelled operations have caused untold distress to so many patients and there families, to prepare your self to undergo a hysterectomy which is a traumatic event at any time besides making work/family arrangements etc and then be told that it has been postponed due to lack of a bed is cruel beyond belief.
As for jjenkins comments,the mobile theatres used at that time, were part of a long term plan to reduce the governments waiting list target and had been arranged well in advance,not a knee jerk reaction like this current situation.
2008 and we are back to Bethlehem facilities, medical treatment in a "Cabin" but I suppose Mary, Joseph and Jesus did not have to pay national insurance,or the best part of £150,000,000 for a one and a half PFI build, half wood half brick white elephant the good news is that they had three wise men and a star in the East,the bad news is we have'nt,will any of the above give a valid informed comment as to why this situation must carry on before fatalities occur,I think not,people are suffering not because of what the LET writes but of the actions of the hospitals.

TONY WALES, NELSON says...
4:28pm Wed 19 Nov 08

We will finish up with a hospital standard that would do Pakistan proud.

Why don't you admit that there are just too many people in the country?

Too many in hospital, too many on the roads, and the schools are too crowded. As long as the population of the country keeps rising, your standards will drop. You can only get so many portions out of a pie.

That's common sense not racist.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »