News RSS Feed


REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Lancashire regeneration agency boss hits back at 'failed quango' claim

1:31pm Friday 8th August 2008

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »

Photograph of the Author By Tom Moseley »

THE boss of an agency charged with regenerating Lancashire has hit back at claims it was “throwing away money”.

The Northwest Development Agency (NWDA) was one of nine to be branded “failed quangos” by lobby group the Taxpayers’ Alliance.

According to the alliance, the unelected government bodies, which give out millions of pounds in a bid to boost employment, economic regeneration and reduce the gap between different regions, have cost taxpayers £15billion since 1999.

The alliance, which campaigns for lower taxation, criticised the salaries of regional development agency bosses, including NWDA chief executive Steven Broomhead, who said he earned £130,000 a year.

But NWDA bosses said a number of key projects in Lancashire would not have got off the ground without the agency’s support.

Mr Broomhead said: “The role and purpose of the NWDA is to ensure sustainable economic growth in the north west.

“Since our inception in 1999, we have made a significant impact across the region, creating or safeguarding almost 200,000 jobs, creating over 17,000 new businesses, and levering in £3billion of private sector investment.

“In Lancashire, the agency is continuing to provide added value to the local economy.

"We are making a real and tangible difference with a number of jobs and projects that simply would not have been secured without NWDA involvement and support.”

Critics say the agencies replicate the role of other public bodies and provide an extra layer of bureaucracy.

And council bosses in Lancashire have recently claimed they are under-represented on the NWDA and often lose out to regional rivals Merseyside and Greater Manchester.

Ben Farrugia, policy analyst at the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “At a time when businesses are increasingly over-regulated and over-taxed, they have become a symbol of wasteful bureaucratic excess.

"They should be abolished before the Government hands them even greater powers.”

Your Say YourTelegraph

Joseph Yossarian, London says...
4:18pm Fri 8 Aug 08

In 2006 Steve Broomhead took home £177,972 in renumeration.
One of 5 execs taking home over 100k a year.
G-r-a-v-y-t-r-a-i-n

andy1, burnley says...
7:57pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Great earning 130k per year talking waffle. Now if your the ordinary bloke on the street and you ask for a decent standard of living those at the top call you greedy. Again we see another unelected Quango with already fat cats on board. To be honest to any ordinary woman or bloke out there would you employ these people? I think the vast ammount would say no not even to sweep the streets. Time Quangos where abolished and ordinary people took over them instead of the already Fat Cats.

Concerned of Colne, Colne says...
6:14pm Sat 9 Aug 08

It is not widely known but the GONW should be overseeing and checking how the money it gived out is used. Unfortunately, the onus is on those who dish out the money to check themselves (eg Pendle Partnership / Council)thus leading to instances of a complete lack of transparency and keeping the money in the family - eg Colne Open Door Centre.
Of course they do not want the General Public to know how little the GONW really know about how and where the money is being spent.

Kevin, Colne, Colne says...
9:09pm Sat 9 Aug 08

There are two issues here. The first is the role of the NWDA in relation to the North West, and the second in regard to the UK.

I presume the money that the NWDA gives out is from taxpayers. This is not 'free' money from heaven but the money has to be extracted from buisnesses and citizens in the first place. In short the net gain in all probability is very little.

If the NWDA has attracted business to the North West that would have been located in another part of the UK, then for the nation as a whole there has been no net gain. In fact what we will have had is regional agencies competing with each other - in short, destroying wealth rather than creating it.

The idea that we somehow are better off because of the NWDA is an idea so absurd that only those in the employ of the Agency and politicians could fall for it.

inventorian, Blackburn says...
12:03pm Mon 11 Aug 08

The NWDA appear to fund huge schemes and totally ignore small businesses, they seem to claim success based on the media attention for the grandiose schemes they back.

With a fellow inventor I have a product that could help 20 million elderly & disabled in the UK, to get it to market would cost under £5000 (yes five thousand) but can't find any funding to help us.

This was achieved despite being chronically ill and me costing the taxpayer thousands a year in benefits, it seems I am in the wrong post-code.

It will not stop me trying to find a way to get it to market, I have approached several large organisations to sponsor the product and help us help others.

The NWDA was I thought supposed to help all businesses in the NorthWest but I was wrong, I thought the lottery supported good causes but applying is a nightmare of obstacles, I even believed that NESTA might help a couple of inventors but they are just as difficult to get help from.

Maybe the acronym is wrong or has two meanings, Not With Development Assistance ;-)

Your sayYourTelegraph

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Lancashire Telegraph account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Steven Broomhead Steven Broomhead

Hot Jobs

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts
Sponsored Adverts