News RSS Feed


REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Driving test shake-up proposals revealed

11:01am Wednesday 7th May 2008

comment Comments (15)   Have your say »


MAJOR changes to the driving test and the driver learning process, including a star-rating system for instructors, were proposed by the Government today.

The proposals are aimed at reducing the high accident rate among young drivers - the subject of the Lancashire Telegraph's Wasted Lives campaign.

The plans will now be consulted on and could see changes in place within two to three years.

Announced today by Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly, the proposals include an improved driving test, which will require candidates to demonstrate independent driving skills, and a clear understanding of different situations on the roads.

The star-rating system for instructors will give learners an informed choice based on pass rates.

The proposals also include a foundation course in safe road use for under 17-year-olds, which will be piloted in schools and colleges in Scotland from this Autumn.

This will lead to a qualification that will be available across Britain.

The driving test will be revised to place less emphasis on mechanical manoeuvres.

For example, drivers could be asked to find their way to a specific point during the test.

The Government also wants to see a more focused and thorough learning process for candidates which looks not just at vehicle control but also the wider skills needed to be a safe driver.

This would include driving in difficult conditions - at night or in poor weather -and learning to predict and respond to other road users' intentions.

In addition there could now be new opportunities to take extra training after the test and there will also be a review of driving instructor training and testing.

Last month, the Lancashire Telegraph met with Mrs Kelly to highlight the calls of its Wasted Lives campaign.

The campaign is aimed at cutting the carnage caused by drivers under the age of 25 and is seeking a number of education and legal reforms.

Ms Kelly said: "Every year more than 750,000 people pass their driving test.

"New drivers are keen to gain the freedom driving offers them to access further education, jobs or keep in touch with family and friends.

"But too many new drivers are involved in road accidents and are not properly prepared for driving alone."

She went on: "It is time for a new approach to learning to drive.

"We must make sure that novice drivers are safe drivers when they have passed their test.

"We must also create an expectation of lifelong learning, so that people continue advance learning after their test.

"That is why I am publishing proposals which offer new drivers more opportunities to learn both before and after the test, including at school.

"Those who undertake extra training will not only be safer drivers but will have the added incentive that they could see a financial reward in terms of lower insurance premiums."

Consultation on the proposals will run until September 8.

The theory test will be updated. Proposed changes include reforming the hazard perception test to encourage candidates to take it when they have some on-road experience.

The Driving Standards Agency (DSA) is looking at splitting the theory and practical tests into modules to enable learners to pass elements of the test as they learn.

Retakes could also be done in the same way.

The DSA is also looking at a new marking system for the practical test to make it more effective and consistent.

The foundation course proposed will cover the Highway Code, planning journeys, social attitude, peer pressure, fatigue, being safe on the road, and eco-driving.

The DSA proposes that young people will be able to start studying for this foundation qualification from autumn this year.

Other parts of the programme, such as changes to the driving test, could be in place within two or three years.

Road deaths and serious injuries have fallen by 33% since the mid-1990s, but the casualty rate for young drivers has not changed.

As many as 20% of people have an accident within six months of passing the test and a further 70% report near-misses in the same period.

Newly qualified drivers and their passengers account for 20% of all car deaths in Britain.



Your Say YourLancashire Telegraph

doug fish, pike hill says...
9:45am Wed 7 May 08

What harm does it do to sensible driving campaigns when people like Andrew Flintoff hire people like Mr Loophole to skirt round justice on a technicality?
If Flintoff was any kind of responsible adult surely he would hold his hand up, say, Yes I've done wrong and take his medicine like the thousands of people who cant afford a celebrity lawyer

Sarah, Preston says...
11:08am Wed 7 May 08

While I can see what you're saying, doug, the fact is that the government is scamming the motorist for every penny it can get and is using "technicalities" to fine drivers and tax them as much as possible. If they want the driver to do everything by the book, then they should not be making any mistakes themselves. The 14-day rule is NOT a loophole (ie something missing from the legislation). It is actually written into the legislation. So if they get it wrong, then that's their fault.

mutley, says...
11:38am Wed 7 May 08

you tell him sarah

Merlin, The Voice of Reason, Ramsbottom says...
11:46am Wed 7 May 08

I wonder if Sarah is a lawyer?

doug fish, pike hill says...
12:29pm Wed 7 May 08

Like most people whp are happy to quote thelaw and the legislation, one hopes you are as happy to see an "offender" walk free on a technicality when it's your kid or your property that's injured or damaged.
If you break the law, you broke the law, whether some smartass lawyer knows a way to fiddle the system or not.
Does anyone seriously believe that Sir alex Ferguson was driving up the hard shoulder to finda toilet or that Ronne O'Sullivan couldn't pee through depression?
Grow up

doug fish, pike hill says...
12:33pm Wed 7 May 08

One hopes you're as understanding and as supportive of points of pedantry when it's a member of your family or your property that's injured/damaged by a driver breaking the law but whose paperwork came thru 2 days late

Dom, Lancashire says...
1:09pm Wed 7 May 08

He only knows how to work the system because the government and judges allow these loopholes to remain in place.

What is more concerning is the 6 month limit on a motoring offence.

The case of Olivia Whiteside is something that should not have gone unpunished.

jcb, says...
2:08pm Wed 7 May 08

I totally agree with Doug Fish, Pike Hill and his intelligent, reasoned arguing. Trouble is, where motoring is concerned you will always get the people (usually males) who think they are above the law because they are brilliant drivers and shouldn't be restricted in any way. And yes, Flintoff has just exposed his true character by not standing up and saying "fair cop guv". Doing 87 in a 50 limit just proves the lack of a usable brain.

Gerri, Darwen says...
2:15pm Wed 7 May 08

I will be taking my practical driving test in three weeks. Reading this article I'm struck by how pointless most of these suggestions seem to be. While the Road Safety qualification seems a good idea and I would certainly have taken it if I'd had the opportunity some of the other proposals put the learner at a further disadvantage.

Take the option of making someone get to a fixed point during the test - Currently the DSA advise not driving the test routes so how does this one work. When driving in real life if I want to get somewhere I haven't been before I'll check a map before I set out and follow directions - so will that be allowed on test?

The Star rating for instructors based on pass rate also concerns me. It will encourage Instructors to hold back pupils from test when they are ready just so they don't damage their score. Its a pricy enough business learning to drive - £23 an hour is average round here and the DSA recommends 40+ hours of tuition before test already. If you are doing 2 x 2 hour lessons a week even a small delay in getting to test will cost a fortune.

rosie, says...
2:33pm Wed 7 May 08

tough **** gerri in my time i thought 10 quid an hour was a rip off, times change so do prices get on with it.

vikingpower, blackburn says...
2:53pm Wed 7 May 08

what it boils down to is we have a generation of selfish,lawless brats bringing their anti social ways onto the roads.The proposed plans will make no difference whatsoever.

Gerri, Darwen says...
2:57pm Wed 7 May 08

rosie wrote:
tough **** gerri in my time i thought 10 quid an hour was a rip off, times change so do prices get on with it.
I don't care how much it cost you to learn to drive. My point was that it already costs a lot anyway and the idea of giving instructors a star rating based on pass rates will encourage them to keep pupils away from test longer. If you thought £10 an hour was a rip off 'in your time' you wouldn't have been happy if you'd been forced to do 10 extra hours because your instructor was too scared to put you to test.

I'd love to see you try to pass a driving test now.

observer, says...
3:04pm Wed 7 May 08

Sarah wrote:
While I can see what you're saying, doug, the fact is that the government is scamming the motorist for every penny it can get and is using "technicalities" to fine drivers and tax them as much as possible. If they want the driver to do everything by the book, then they should not be making any mistakes themselves. The 14-day rule is NOT a loophole (ie something missing from the legislation). It is actually written into the legislation. So if they get it wrong, then that's their fault.
But the simple fact is that Flintoff, especially as a 'role model' shouldn't have been going at 87 in a 50mph zone in the first place and if he was, he should admit it and take the consequences. What a good example that would be to young kids who look up to him, but as it is, they will think it is okay to drive at speed whatever the rules and there will continue to be accidents all over the place due to a total lack of respect for other road users.

BillyNidNod, moowurtops says...
3:48pm Wed 7 May 08

ChAngE cHANGE chAngE .Nuw LABOUR. CANT LAEVE things alone ..they meddle to Complicate everythin ..costs will be GoiN through the roof i BET FOR THE ORDFOLk..UP.UP.UP NU LABOUR = bad nuws

sal, says...
3:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Emphasis should be put on decision making whilst driving. Big deal if you can't reverse around a corner...most people can only manage it for the test! i see sooo many poor decisions by people each day..like today some lady behind a bus, decided to pass it..whilst she could not see around the corner and there I am driving along and having to stop. On the weekend some man tried to pass two cars on a steep slope and again I was coming in the opposite direction and had to come to a near complete stop....really the cars he was passing should have slowed or stopped...but they don't as its not something they are taught to do. nevermind the poor decision making! I see so many people driving at the limit just because the sign says 30..when really they should be going slower - particularily down narrow residential streets where a child or ball or person or car could jump out at any time.

Comments are closed on this article.

Ruth Kelly Ruth Kelly

Sponsored Links


Local advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »