Send us your news tips, photos and videos Text LT and your message to 80360 or click here for more ways to contact us »
REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES
It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.
10:20pm Wednesday 19th March 2008
BENEFIT cheats will be named and shamed as part of a council's zero-tolerance campaign.
Rossendale Council is warning residents who claim benefits they are not entitled to that they will be caught and placed on their website.
As part of the anti-fraud campaign, posters will be displayed across the borough.
The council has prosecuted five people for benefit fraud since May last year.
Anne Egan, of Bacup, received a 36-week suspended sentence and 100 hours community punishment after she cheated tax payers out of over £30,000 by failing to declare that her partner was living with her.
Keith Broxton, of Lumb, was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £100 costs when he lied about his savings so he could claim over £11,000 in job seekers allowance and council tax benefit.
Shirley Smith, of Stacksteads, dishonestly received housing benefit and council tax benefit payments totalling over £11,000 by failing to notify the Council and Department of Work and Pensions that she was in employment.
She received 18-months conditional discharge.
Details of other benefit cheats can be found on the Council's website.
Head of customer services and ICT at Rossendale Council, Andrew Buckle, said the council had a zero-tolerance attitude towards benefit fraud.
He said: "The methods available to us are getting more sophisticated and agencies are getting better at working together to tackle fraud.
"Those who try to cheat the system end up hitting those who need benefits the most. Benefit fraud is not a vic-timless crime."
bcj, says...
11:42am Thu 20 Mar 08
JUST ME XX, lancs says...
10:46pm Thu 20 Mar 08
bcj wrote:zero tolerance from the council???? what about the fraud you do,taking and demanding money not owed????
We all know how incompetent these departments are....they better make sure they have comprehensive evdidence prior to naming and shaming otherwise they've got huge libel claims coming there way.
quote
lee, stacksteads says...
8:58am Sat 22 Mar 08
bcj wrote:I dont think eve nthe council are daft enough to name somebody without the charges already being brought beforehand do you?If you notice with them named it said what they had been done for.
We all know how incompetent these departments are....they better make sure they have comprehensive evdidence prior to naming and shaming otherwise they've got huge libel claims coming there way.
mike lightsout, Darwen says...
12:33pm Sat 22 Mar 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
jcb, says...
7:33am Thu 20 Mar 08