News RSS Feed


REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Celebrating 200 years without slave trade

9:45am Monday 26th March 2007

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »


Click here to see our gallery of photos from the commemoration.

SLAVERY in East Lancashire was the focus at a special cathedral service celebrating the 200th anniversary of the trade's abolition.

JOIN THE DEBATE

Should we formally apologise for slavery? Add your comments below.

Blackburn Cathedral yesterday was attended by hundreds of people including the Most Rev Drexel Gomez, Archbishop of the West Indies, and Bishop of Burnley Rt Rev John Goddard.

Canon Chris Chivers of Blackburn Cathedral said the town had deep connections with several forms of slavery.

Lancashire merchants like Henry Sudell, whose memorial is in the cathedral, received American cotton picked by slaves.

Canon Chivers said: "Economically, it was enmeshed in the so-called slave-trading triangle'.

"They traded the products which were manufactured from this cotton, amassing huge profits in the process."

Although the slave trade in Britain was abolished by an Act passed 200 years ago, it was not abolished in America until after the Civil War, which ended in 1865.

Throughout the greater part of the 19th century, Blackburn mill owners continued to buy cotton - the fruit of slave-labour.

Canon Chivers added. "So dependent was Lancashire on this trading, that the American Civil War and consequent Cotton Famine in the States, literally brought the local economy in Blackburn to its knees."

Church and civic leaders marked abolition at an Ecumenical Evensong and heard a sermon from Archbishop Gomez.

He said: "I am pleased to give thanks for the abolition of slavery 200 years ago.

"The trade of slaves deprived between five and 20 million of their dignity, their freedom and ultimately their lives, something which is beyond imagination for us."

African music was included in the service and young people traced, through stark statistics, the brutalisation of people involved in various forms of slavery, from the world's largest forced migration into prostitution.

Harold Whittaker, 46, from Burnley, said: "It was marvellous to see so many people taking an interest in our history. I heard about it and thought I would come to listen, it's been very insightful."

Sheila Knowles, 67, of Highfield Road, Blackburn, added: "The service made me realise how lucky we are but it also highlighted that slavery still goes on today, something which many people do not know about."

Archbishop Gomez was also due to give a lecture in the cathedral tonight at 7.30pm.


Your Say YourLancashire Telegraph

Ian G, England says...
9:49am Tue 27 Mar 07

If the people that were affected by slavery directly were alive today I would categorically support a full and humble apology, reparations and prosecutions of those responsible.

Slavery was abolished 200 years ago and those directly affected or those responsible will have died at least 100 years ago (at a push!).

Acknowledgement of the fact that Britain was acutely responsible for slavery and regret for the horrors that our ancestors committed is wholly appropriate and necessary.

HOWEVER, why should we 200 years hence, apologise for something that we had absolutely nothing to do with? Why should our Prime Minister apologise for something that his predecessors committed more than a fifth of a millennium previously?

Apology, No! Regret, absolutely!

As for paying reparations - I leave you to judge my opinion on that!

Sal, says...
10:35pm Tue 27 Mar 07

A very cynical post. It is time for the "empire" to return stolen artefacts and pay reparations. Many forget that much of the glorious mansions, castles and houses and other buildings, were built either with slave labour or as a result of the profits of the slave trade. Reparations are due.

Ian G, England says...
8:31am Wed 28 Mar 07

Sal, why is this cynical?

Who should the "empire" pay reparations to? There is no-one currently living that was affected directly by slavery.

Please tell me, why should we apologise and pay for something our ancestors did? We are not responsible.

Why will an acknowledgement and regret for their actions not suffice?

Are you suggesting that the current owners of the glorious mansions, castles and houses should hand them over?

I suggest that your politically correct attitude towards this subject are clouding your grasp of the reality of the situation.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »