IT IS politically incorrect, of course, but I thoroughly enjoyed the
state visit of the King and Queen of Norway to Edinburgh last week. The
sight of the Household Cavalry pounding along Princes Street was worth
all the waiting, the warmth of the welcome by the citizenry a brush-off
to the cynics.
I was fortunate enough to be invited to the lunch in the Assembly
Rooms where King Harald made a simple but moving speech, including the
always impressive trick of cracking a joke in someone else's language.
Wish I could do that.
At the function there was
a notable collection of former lords provost and magistrates of every
political hue, indeed just for once the council itself appeared to have
dropped the party favours. Maybe royalty has its uses after all.
The present lord provost, who has not escaped criticism in this
column, deserves the highest praise for the manner in which he conducted
his duties last week.
He is a Scottish Nationalist but first and foremost he is the capital
city's symbol, a role he plays with considerable dignity. Norman Irons
has grown into the job and is highly thought of in the business
community.
The bands, the coaches, the service personnel, the pomp, and pageantry
of the occasion have been too much for the sneerers and moaners, many
of whom are on permanent
guard duty in the Scottish media.
We must not let a little colour into our lives; we could even find
ourselves enjoying
it.
The money could have been spent better is an oft-heard cry. Give it to
the poor, spend it on housing or old folk. Yet if we had handed over
every penny in exchange for a copy of the Big Issue, would the world
really have been a better place, I wonder?
There were secondary moans about the traffic chaos. ''It took me half
an hour to get up Leith Walk.'' So what?
If you want to live in Hicksville, the back of beyond, or just
downwind of the bing, off you go. This is one of the great cities of the
world, we have to gasp at its grandeur from time to time even if that
does mean the number 26 bus is a little behind schedule.
Edinburgh has an indigenous traffic problem, most of the trouble
stemming from the highways committee of Lothian Regional Council.
Its crackpot schemes, ludicrously labelled traffic calming, are
designed to raise the blood pressure of every motorist.
The council is against the private motor car (though not against
riding around in limos paid for by us). Therefore each and every major
road is targeted to make it more and more difficult to actually drive
along.
I never saw anyone speeding down the High Street for instance. Yet
another major reconstruction, at a cost which makes the royal visit seem
spartan, has reduced the width of the carriageway. It takes but one
vehicle to stop, maybe for delivery purposes, to cause instant
grid-lock.
Should an aircraft, maybe piloted by the Prince of Wales, require to
be diverted from Turnhouse, worry not -- we have city centre pavements
that are as big as runways, he can put down on the George IV Bridge.
Mind you, he will be held up at many sets of traffic lights -- Edinburgh
is the world leader in them.
I do not object at all to safety measures, sleeping policemen, bumps,
reduced speed limits et al, in residential areas. No doubt these make a
contribution to a reduction in accidents.
But I want the traffic on main roads to move at a reasonable pace. The
capital is crying out for a proper one-way system but until the zealots
have gone we are quicker to hike.
Forgive me, I digress. The main point of this polemic is to restate
the view that this
country should remain a monarchy and perhaps to realise again the
value of our royal family.
Of course one is disappointed that the marriages of the Queen's
children have not all been happy. For many families that is hardly a
novel situa
tion.
Yes, I wince at the strangulated vowels of the Prince of Wales but I
am convinced he is a sincere, caring person with his country's best
interests at heart. I hope he will come to the throne.
If it were up to me he would be perfectly free, after a
divorce, to remarry and find someone who can be his Queen. A separated
monarch seems a sad option, the idea that the Princess of Wales
can be crowned too is simply
daft.
There will be a requirement for the Windsors to cut back on a few of
the ceremonials of office, to end some of the expensive nonsenses --
like the royal train -- and indeed that is already happening.
They might like to learn from their Norwegian visitors in this field
-- my information is that King Harald likes to pop into his local
library unannounced.
For all the faults of our lot, though, I still would not trade them
for a boring old president. If that is what the Aussies are after it is
no more than they deserve.
The Prime Minister, who is not given to making jokes in any language,
indicated the other day that more state visits might be coming
Edinburgh's way. Cue for rattling of begging bowls and more whines about
the inconvenience.
I have found an instant method of silencing my home city critics . . .
suggest the whole show is moved to Glasgow.
Wee Pat Lally would have a ball. But one female Glasgow councillor,
who was present at the Edinburgh lunch, might search in vain for her
invitation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article