Residents fight new homes plan for Bacup

NEIGHBOURS are opposing plans for 20 family homes on a patch of open space.

A consultation event at Bacup Hub was attended by traders and councillors, who described the proposals to build next to the community building as unnecessary.

Catherine Murphy, owner of the Burnley Road Hub, said joint plans by Rossendale Council, Together Housing and Barnfield Construction, could lead to her losing her licence to sell alcohol.

She said: “It is inevitable that if 20 families move in here, they will eventually object to the Hub’s alcohol licence.

“I was aware there was a possibility of housing being built here when I purchased the Hub (in 2010), but the plans have changed. The council say they will vet the people moving in and warn them I have late-night events, but I’m worried I’ll be forced out and will have invested £300,000 for no reason.

“The bar is what makes the money to allow us to subsidise charity and community events. Without it, I fear we’d close within two years. I have offered to buy the land off the council at full market value, and they have turned that down.”

Bosses from Green Vale Homes, part of the Together Housing group, out- lined proposals to build 10 two-bedroom and 10 three-bedroom homes on a council-owned field just south of the Hub.

David Lawrie, chairman of Bacup Traders’ Association, said: “I asked Green Vale Homes to prove the demand for two and three-bedroom homes in Bacup. They had done no research, and had no answers.”

Ian Clark, Green Vale Homes’ managing direct-or, said: “There is a dire need for quality, affordable housing across the country and the mood of the consultation event was mainly positive. This development will boost the local economy, while providing families with some much-needed hous-ing. The proposals for 20 homes will be submitted at the end of the month.”

Comments(10)

pdb951 says...
10:12pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Another example of this greedy stupid council. Leave the hub alone. You go someone to run the old centre. Now you want to destroy it. Truth is you do not care. You are lying and deceitfull

her from here says...
10:50pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Surely consultation should happen before the plans were drawn up I think this could be a done deal. .I hope not Bacup deserves treating better than this.

mysay.com says...
2:21am Sat 23 Mar 13

and yet they say that there will be 350 of their own residents affected by the bedroom tax, therefore wanting one bedroom houses.which will leave 350 of their own 2 and 3 bedroom houses empty.....so why build more...and yet no plans for any 1 bedroom houses....we already have over 90 houses being built in Bacup...fill them first before stealing public land without consultation!!!

mavrick says...
9:11am Sat 23 Mar 13

It is a done deal, They could not answer the question of proof of demand. says it all really.

JBasdf says...
10:24am Sat 23 Mar 13

Forget it, Greenvale Homes councils are in thier pocket, only have to look at the some of the stuff given permission to build in whitworth, the vast majority of the residents where against the plans but they got through.

billy32 says...
6:21pm Sat 23 Mar 13

I think it is stupid and very short sighted of the Bacup council to "in effect" force the Bacup Hub to be threatened by building houses so close to the Hub. In my opinion the Hub fills the need by the local people to have a place that they can use to keep the community close and able to meet and hold events together. If the Hub is forced to close what or who will the council blame, i bet it will be Cath. Also what will happen to the workers who will be laid off because their jobs have gone. The Bacup Council should think hard and long and not just think of the monies that they will gain. I hope that the local people who use the Hub stand up and get their voices heard.

her from here says...
6:28pm Sat 23 Mar 13

mavrick wrote:
It is a done deal, They could not answer the question of proof of demand. says it all really.
Ask the council how much they are selling the land to Greenvale for ? It will be nowhere near the true value, Take this as far as you can you never know you might win Good Luck

mysay.com says...
6:42pm Sat 23 Mar 13

her from here wrote:
mavrick wrote:
It is a done deal, They could not answer the question of proof of demand. says it all really.
Ask the council how much they are selling the land to Greenvale for ? It will be nowhere near the true value, Take this as far as you can you never know you might win Good Luck
that's the amusing thing.....they have been offered full market value for the land...to keep it green....but they have rejected the offer in favour of literally GIVING it away to greenvale homes.....not exactly compliant with their buty and responsibility to gain the best possible price for any land which they plan to "dispose of" ...regardless of the lack on consultation in regard to the land itself

nice person says...
9:11pm Sat 23 Mar 13

Backhanders...If you have proof of your offer,sue them.

nice person says...
10:30pm Sat 23 Mar 13

Maybe someone could ask why there is such a shortage of housing? Could it be that people from other towns are now priority over Bacup people to be rehomed in Bacup.Greenvale have caused the shortage of housing by accepting applicants from other boroughs who are obviously having problems,therefore causing shortages in small towns.Why should applicants from elsewhere have priority over local people,they have given homes away and to meet the criteria for priority,outside boroughs win hands down.Believe me ,i know.Will the 20 homes be filled with local people???No..So where is the shortage,enough said.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree