Plan for 4,000 rural homes on outskirts of Blackburn (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Plan for 4,000 rural homes on outskirts of Blackburn
10:30am Thursday 14th March 2013 in News
By Bill Jacobs, Local government reporter
GREEN field sites covering 1,200 acres of countryside on the outskirts of Blackburn and Darwen have been earmarked for 4,000 executive-style homes.
The land to the north and west of Blackburn and around Darwen has been identified by the council as suitable for larger luxury properties over the next five years in a major switch of housing policy.
View a map of the sites: Blackburn development sites map.pdf
Instead of concentrating on two and three bedroom homes in urban areas, regeneration chiefs now want “Ribble Valley executive homes at Blackburn with Darwen prices”.
They are reacting to the easing of government policy on protecting “green belt” land and a desire to keep wealthy households within the borough as attempts to kick-start the local economy gather pace.
The ten sites, including five on the borders of the rural Ribble Valley currently swamped with applications for housing developments, and five around Darwen, cover 1,198 acres of which 593 are “green belt”.
The council wants 3,500 to 4,000 new luxury homes built there by 2018 taking them almost half way to a target of 9,400 new properties in the next 15 years and easing pressure on the Ribble Valley.
Critics have condemned the plans as in the wrong place, threatening the borough’s country borders and blighting land without any demand for the larger houses.
All sites are considered prime development land where private owners have indicated willingness to consider housing schemes.
The sites are:
- Blackburn Rugby Club, 200 homes
- Brownhill Drive, currently green belt, 300 plus
- Preston New Road, near Scarr Lane, 150 plus
- Parsonage Road, Wilpshire, 60
- Yew Tree Drive (Barker Lane to Preston New Road) 200 plus
- Gib Lane, 500 plus houses on two sites, one on green belt land to the east and one not green belt to the west
- Bailey’s Field Darwen, 500 plus
- Kirkham’s Farm, Cranberry Lane, Darwen, 200
- Pole Lane, Darwen on two sites, one in the north for 133 houses and a second to the south on green belt land for a further 130
- Jack’s Key reservoir, dozens of homes in small pockets.
Tory planning spokesman Alan Cottam said: “These are in the wrong place. There is no demand for this type of home in Blackburn with Darwen and it will destroy the countryside views that make the edges of the borough nice places to live.
“The borough was supposed to build 600 houses last year. Just 12 went up. The risk is that developers will buy this land and bank it for another day.”
Simon Hugill of Blackburn, Darwen and Rural Civic Voice said: “These houses are just not needed and won’t sell. It is not the Ribble Valley.”
Tory leader and Beardwood with Lammack councillor Mike Lee said: “These homes in my ward will be controversial with local residents, especially those around Blackburn Rugby Club. They won’t want development their destroying their country views.”
Borough regeneration director Brian Bailey said: “We are aware of the pressure on Ribble Valley for executive homes. The proposed sites are offering an option to developers to build high class properties with fine country views within Blackburn with Darwen.
“This is good for our borough but also allows us to work closely with our neighbours Ribble Valley. We want to see homes in Blackburn with Darwen offering local people all the advantages of country living while preserving the valley as a place of beauty and recreation.
“They will be Ribble Valley executive homes at Blackburn with Darwen prices.”
Councillor Dave Harling, executive member for regeneration, said: “As our economy grows, we need to ensure we have the right mixture of good quality homes, from small terraced houses and flats to large family or executive homes.
“They are also needed in order to attract new residents and employers to the area.
“Some land outside the built-up area will need to be developed, as well as some green spaces within the borough. “ Ribble Valley Tory leader Michael Ranson said: “I welcome those moves. We need executive homes in our neighbouring boroughs so we can protect our countryside.”
Town planner David Lock said: “This is a good idea by Blackburn with Darwen. There is a demand for these type of houses and I would recommend clients to look at these sites for development.”
Blackburn MP Jack Straw said: “This is a good move. We want people to be able to buy large executive homes and live in and pay their council tax to the borough.”
Second smaller plan to 'test the water'
THE developers behind the biggest single homes proposal in the Ribble Valley for decades have put in a second, smaller planning application.
The borough turned down the original scheme for 504 homes near Barrow after residents branded it ‘horrendous’.
While it is subject to an appeal to be heard this summer, the developer has submitted a smaller application on part of the land.
The Barrow Lands Company is now seeking approval for 190 homes to the south west of Barrow and west of Whalley Road.
Ribble Valley Council had its ‘core strategy’ for housing rejected by the government in January.
Borough leader Michael Ranson said: “I wish they would wait until we have got our core strategy agreed rather than try to force through schemes in the interim.”
David Lock, the Milton Keynes town planner acting for the London firm, said: “This is a smaller application to test the water and see whether the original was rejected over size or location.
“This is Ribble Valley’s own fault. If they had got their core strategy right, we would not need to do this.”
Comments(22)
district01
says...
11:06am Thu 14 Mar 13
Just build a wall around it and leave it how it has become under the leadership of Jack Straw and his council leader and ask them why they don’t live there? Poor Darwen and the outlying countryside. Why spread the misery!
Casper's mum
says...
11:11am Thu 14 Mar 13
How will new housing attract new employers?
Won't building on green belt area increase the risk of flooding?
Aren't there plenty of empty properties we can fill first?
Won't house prices decrease if you take away the views?
district01
says...
11:15am Thu 14 Mar 13
New Labour, the New Conservative Party building homes for the wealthy. What a surprise!
jinkyjase
says...
11:26am Thu 14 Mar 13
You can't rebuild the countryside, when it's gone, it's gone. Councillors should work for the town, not against it.
This plan would destroy the surrounding areas and create an urban sprawl that isn't needed. If there was masses of employment and a demand for housing then upgrade areas within the town before ruining outlying green belt. After all, the surrounding countryside is for the leisure and farming activities of the people of Blackburn & Darwen.
Madness will probably prevail, it nearly always does.
juanbbien
says...
11:36am Thu 14 Mar 13
darwenTower
says...
11:40am Thu 14 Mar 13
Casper's mum wrote:Sounds about right.
Why do we need to attract new residents to the area?
How will new housing attract new employers?
Won't building on green belt area increase the risk of flooding?
Aren't there plenty of empty properties we can fill first?
Won't house prices decrease if you take away the views?
As far as Darwen is concerned I hear the authorities feel it would be best for it to become a 'commuter town'.
Fancyish houses with better transport links to where the jobs are.
happycyclist
says...
11:42am Thu 14 Mar 13
Well sort the council tax bands out then. They haven't been reviewed for 20 years and the max you're going to pull in is around £2,500pa. People living in 'executive' houses are getting a fantastic deal on their council tax compared to those in the lowest band.
emigrator
says...
11:50am Thu 14 Mar 13
New homes !! what about completing unfinished developments e.g. Belgrave in Darwen - a blight on our towns landscape for years. And renovate existing property at a much reduced cost to provide affordable accomodation for the young average earners in our community. Kate - your days are numbered. Come the Revolution.
Wishingwell
says...
12:21pm Thu 14 Mar 13
happycyclist
says...
12:49pm Thu 14 Mar 13
wned houses to rent. Cheaper rents mean that people can afford to take lower-paid jobs. It also helps to lower the Housing Benefit bill, with the money going straight back to the government anyway rather than to private landlords.
And use ENGLISH builders, not cheap foreign labour. This helps keep the money in the UK economy instead of being sent home to be spent in other countries.
BlackburnBadger
says...
1:09pm Thu 14 Mar 13
Major Tom
says...
3:19pm Thu 14 Mar 13
Blackburnlegacy
says...
3:31pm Thu 14 Mar 13
jogalot
says...
3:32pm Thu 14 Mar 13
jinkyjase wrote:Spot on. No consideration whatsoever for real quality of life. No appreciation for the natural beauty that surrounds us. They paved paradise and put up a parking lot!. Doesn't it make all readers want to cry? So very very sad.
"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot"
You can't rebuild the countryside, when it's gone, it's gone. Councillors should work for the town, not against it.
This plan would destroy the surrounding areas and create an urban sprawl that isn't needed. If there was masses of employment and a demand for housing then upgrade areas within the town before ruining outlying green belt. After all, the surrounding countryside is for the leisure and farming activities of the people of Blackburn & Darwen.
Madness will probably prevail, it nearly always does.
sean_brfc
says...
4:00pm Thu 14 Mar 13
themaskedavenger
says...
4:23pm Thu 14 Mar 13
Central govt has told the council either to choose 10 sites for private development across the town or it will pick the sites for it. So, in a clever move the Labour council has chosen sites largely in Tory areas which will mostly anger right wing NIMBY's.
oldblue
says...
4:37pm Thu 14 Mar 13
Major Tom wrote:You overstate your case in an offensive manner Major Tom. Nobody could argue that Blackburn is an attractive town but it is home to many thousands of decent people and a large number of very decent houses. I for one am glad that you chose Egerton and not Blackburn. We do not want people like you living amongst us..
What a bunch of NIMBY's. I don't anybody in the right mind who would want to live in that hole of a town anyway. When moving from Todmorden to Egerton (employment reasons (I now work in Bolton) I did a lot of scouting to live in a decent area and Blackbun with Darwin came bottom of the list. The housing is rubbish, restaurants are terrible, shopping is abysmal, and most of all the people are the kind of types with bigger chips on their shoulders than the jolly green giant could handle. SO, who in the right mind would want to live in a place like that?
davidious
says...
5:54pm Thu 14 Mar 13
We need to move with the times and requierments.
During the current crisis we need to look to the future, and think of our childrens chances of owning thier own home, which is proving very difficult to even to get a mortgage during the current climate.
So if we had more houses the prices would come down and be affordable for our next generations to come.
I bet the critics are sat in their mortgage free houses admiring the green fields without a care for the folk at the other end of the scale
Good call
says...
8:47pm Thu 14 Mar 13
davidious wrote:Yes that's what we need isn't it urban sprawl,buliding shed sized houses with no chance of self sufficency all over Blackburn and Darwen.Screw the council, they will do whatever the company offering the biggest brown envelope says.If we all stood together and withdrew our council tax, they would have no choice but to not build.
Davidious says...
We need to move with the times and requierments.
During the current crisis we need to look to the future, and think of our childrens chances of owning thier own home, which is proving very difficult to even to get a mortgage during the current climate.
So if we had more houses the prices would come down and be affordable for our next generations to come.
I bet the critics are sat in their mortgage free houses admiring the green fields without a care for the folk at the other end of the scale
P.S:Prices will never decrease, the banking scum rig the market, just like everything else.
drunken donut
says...
9:52pm Thu 14 Mar 13
Major Tom wrote:I always thought that Darwin was a beautiful city in Australia so why would it come bottom of a list put together by an illiterate moron.
What a bunch of NIMBY's. I don't anybody in the right mind who would want to live in that hole of a town anyway. When moving from Todmorden to Egerton (employment reasons (I now work in Bolton) I did a lot of scouting to live in a decent area and Blackbun with Darwin came bottom of the list. The housing is rubbish, restaurants are terrible, shopping is abysmal, and most of all the people are the kind of types with bigger chips on their shoulders than the jolly green giant could handle. SO, who in the right mind would want to live in a place like that?
peely
says...
10:40am Fri 15 Mar 13
Carers ? Voluntary workers ? Pound shop employees ? Have you ever heard such drivel in all your life , these people must be in cloud cuckoo and certainly not in Blackburn .
Most folk in Blackburn are dreaming of the day they can sell up and get out of Blackburn not in !
phil kernot says...
10:50am Thu 14 Mar 13