Darwen homes plan 'must go ahead now' (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Darwen homes plan 'must go ahead now'
12:48pm Thursday 7th February 2013 in News
LEADING opposition borough councillors have called for action to ensure that a controversial 133- home development on land between Pole Lane and Spring Meadows in Darwen goes ahead quickly.
Tory Alan Cottam and Liberal Democrat David Foster are concerned that now the scheme has planning permission, the developer will ‘landbank’ the site for months or make a small start on construction work, leaving it as a part-finished building site.
Coun Cottam tackled regeneration boss Dave Harling at the Blackburn with Darwen Council forum on the issue.
He said he was concerned that the site on green-belt land could be ‘banked’ until property values rose and then sold on.
Coun Foster feared work would be started but not finished.
Coun Harling said: “We have held discussions with the applicants and they have made it clear they wish to progress to selling the land to a house builder and develop the site. They have agreed to a two-year time limit.”
Builder David Knowles said: “We haven’t bought it to landbank it, we want to start work as soon as possible.
“I have no idea at the moment when work will start but we have a big site meeting later this week.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (6)
3:18pm Thu 7 Feb 13
jokeplans says...
So i think i speak for hundreds of families around Pole Lane who say NO WAY ! And if things do improve, eg Banks are lending again and the housing market picks up well go and find some other land to build the rubbish thrown up plaster board ticky tacky boxes that all look the same somewhere else !!!
Or could it be that people can be bought these days ??? What next ? A multi-plex cinema nr Darwen Tower.
3:33pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Major Tom says...
4:13pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Symboy21 says...
I agree no more planning until half finished sites are complete. The crown site developer has gone bust so the site needs to be sold on for some one else to finish.
4:37pm Thu 7 Feb 13
tombhoy says...
11:37am Fri 8 Feb 13
english rose 1 says...
*
According to the report the land is 'green-belt' - it isn't. It's been allocated as 'safeguarded' land for many many years. (safeguarded for future housing development.)
*
Recent changes in Govt planning rules means that Council's cannot now refuse developments on the grounds that other developments have not finished.
11:54pm Fri 8 Feb 13
Mart8 says...
Major Tom, it's a shame you have nothing constructive to bring to the debate other than low level name calling. That's a very weak attitude.