Councillors defer decision on Blackburn convenience store (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Councillors defer decision on Blackburn convenience store
9:06am Saturday 26th January 2013 in News
COUNCILLORS have put off a vote on approving a new convenience shop in part of Blackburn carpet store.
They decided to make a second visit to the site in Cherry Tree because of concerns about parking and the effect on a nearby newsagents.
Blackburn with Darwen council planning committee deferred a decision on the proposal despite a warning it could spark a legal challenge.
Holts of Cherry Tree Carpet and Flooring Centre in Preston Old Road want to split the existing ground floor premises in two to allow Sainsbury’s to open a convenience store.
They also want to turn the upstairs offices into a gym and pilates room.
The firm told the council approval would generate a £250,000 investment creating 24 jobs.
Newsagent Stephen Worsley told the councillors the proposed store would have a damaging effect on his business 300 metres away and contravene borough guidelines on establishing new shops near existing ones.
The committee also received four written objections on grounds of parking problems, noise, disturbance and alcohol sales.
Tory planning spokesman Alan Cottam supported his concerns and said similar supermarket chain satellites had already closed existing small shops elsewhere in the borough.
He also doubted the applicant could find the promised 24 parking spaces for customers to avoid traffic chaos in Cherry Tree.
His concerns were backed by committee chairman Jim Smith and Suddell Liberal Democrat Paul Browne.
Coun Cottam originally proposed rejection but then asked the committee to defer a decision for a second site visit to examine whether the applicant’s proposal for 24 extra parking spaces for staff and customers was realistic.
The committee voted to put off the decision despite borough development manager Gavin Prescott warning it could open them to an appeal.
Coun Smith and coun Browne confirmed the applicant had said the proposed convenience store would be operated by national supermarket chain Sainsbury’s.
Louise Gill, of Holts’ agents Sunderland Peacock and Associates, had no comment to make on the decision.
No-one from Sainsbury’s was available for comment.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (7)
9:39am Sat 26 Jan 13
TONY WALES says...
But because these giant companies have such wealth, and can afford the legal costs with appealing against such judgements, in the end they usually get what they want.
Sad really, but that is the fact of life because of the way we are now shopping.
Getting everything we want in one shopping trip to a large supermarket, or buying on the internet, either way will see the end of the local corner shop.
One tactic they use is to promise a large number of jobs (and lets face it any area needs jobs), or else start spending some money on a local project to try to win over the population. But in the end they will get their supermarket.
9:44am Sat 26 Jan 13
2 for 5p says...
10:14am Sat 26 Jan 13
burner says...
11:51am Sat 26 Jan 13
Riverside 7 says...
Seriously, in the past lots of local councils have been conned by the promise of jobs by the large supermarkets.
I recall someone telling me a true story about a friend who applied for a job at Tesco's in Great Harwood.
Apparently Tesco's had promised the creation of 330 jobs at their new store there.
After the interview, he was told - 'Congratulations, I am pleased to offer you a job'. The problem was, he was offered just 2 hours per week.
He asked just what was the point of 2 hours per week when he needed a full time job to feed his family and declined their offer.
By offering small part-time jobs such as this, Tesco's can then claim that they have created numerous jobs.
Don't get fooled again !
2:54pm Sat 26 Jan 13
Dave_P says...
3:28pm Sat 26 Jan 13
sen c ble says...
Why do you always choose to refer to the 'asians' and bring in asian related topics for any comments that you make, and when referring to 'asians' which particular asian cultured background are you citing???
6:23pm Sat 26 Jan 13
burner says...