Home
Telegraph comment
Lent blog
Adam Hosker
Crabtree twins
Sir Bill Taylor
Caroline Dutton
Lord Greaves
Margo Grimshaw
Shuiab Khan
Rev Kevin Logan
Helen Mead
Nick Nunn
Harry Nuttall
Jack Straw
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Lord Greaves  RSS Feed RSS feed | About
If you ask the Lordships they’ll talk and talk

Last week did not go to plan.

I did not get to London in time to ask my question about teaching geography due to flooding on the line at Kirkstall - a truly geographical irony that had some of their Lordships smiling when "my noble friend" Baroness Walmsley stood in for me and told them why I was not there.

I was there on Wednesday to move my 35 amendments on the government's "pay-as-you-throw" plans, the so-called "bin tax".

But for the second week we never reached them. It's clear that if you ask their Lordships to talk about global warming they will talk, and talk, and talk.

One of the debates was about flooding and the need for a more joined-up approach by all the different agencies - the water companies, councils, Environment Agency, Natural England and the rest.

A few weeks after the flooding last summer I went to Hull to and toured some of the areas where people were beginning the long job of getting their homes back to normal.

So I chipped in about the experiences there, which were quite remarkable since neither the river banks nor the sea defences gave way - it was "pluvial" flooding, just the effect of a lot of rain on a very flat city whose drains could not take the water.

There may be more such cases if the weather becomes more extreme, one of the more likely results of the planet heating up.

We're on again tomorrow with the Climate Change Bill. This time we'll definitely get to the Bin Tax stuff because we are next in the lists.

So why am I so determined that we give these proposals a really good scrubbing down? Surely anything that tackles climate change is a good thing, full stop?

Well first, because it's our job to go through new legislation line by line in a way the Commons rarely does. It's the Lords as a "scrutinising and revising chamber"".

And second, if as I suspect the idea of charging people according to how much they throw out is not sensible (far too many problems in principle and practice), imposing these schemes will only bring the very necessary and serious cause of putting greenhouse gases into disrepute.

12:07pm Tuesday 29th January 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive


Start a conversation on Lord Greaves' column - or any topic under the sun - in our new Forum.
Lancashire Search
Powered by Powered by Fish4

Hot Jobs

Hairstylist
Blackpool
Sleep ins
Accrington
Driver
Lancashire
Co-ordinator
Blackburn
Retail Directory
MEDIA PACK
All the information you need about our great advertising deals
PHOTO SALES
Buy photos that have appeared in the Lancashire Telegraph
FEATURES
Browse special features and supplements
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network